Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genotypic variation in agronomic and physiological responses of potato cultivars to water stress under greenhouse conditions

Fadia Chairi; Marc Lateur; Yordan MuhovskI

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Due to the effects of climate change, conditions tend to be increasingly extreme, with water availability being one of the main limiting factors in potato production. The objective of this study was to analyze the differential response of physiological and yield components in eight potato varieties under water deficit conditions. For this purpose, a greenhouse trial was carried out with the varieties Bintje, Montis, Sevilla, Lady Jane, Louisa, Dior, Acoustic and Tentation. Varieties were submitted to a moderate water stress (MS) and severe water stress (SS) from 23 days after planting (DAP) until 55 DAP and compared to well-watered (WW) condition. Data were collected on morphological traits such as plant height and root length and weight. As well as the physiological traits such as stomatal conductance (gs), chlorophyll and Flavonoid content, relative water content (RWC), water use efficiency (WUE) and carbon isotope composition. At 55 DAP yield components were determined. Variation of all parameters (Δ) in comparison with control were calculated and contrasted with a drought tolerant index (TDI). Drought stress significantly reduced biomass, tuber number, and plant height, but genotypes responded differently, reflecting notable genetic diversity in tolerance mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced biomass, tuber number and plant height in potato relative to well-watered control.

Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
biomass, tuber number, and plant heighte1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
greenhouse conditionst0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato cultivars to water stress under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress significantly reduced biomass, tuber number, and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1191 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato genotypes responded differently to drought, reflecting notable genetic diversity in tolerance mechanisms.

Material
genotypese1
Outcome
tolerance mechanismse1
Qualifier
notable genetic diversitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato cultivars to water stress under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“but genotypes responded differently, reflecting notable genetic diversity in tolerance mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1290 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

47 papers: 10 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.