Paper · 2025 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Reduction of incidence of weeds in maize through the use of cover species

Modesto Da Silva Oviedo; Amilcar Servín Niz; Alcides Fernández Sánchez; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different cover crops in suppressing weed emergence and their influence on maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay (23°25'40.3"S, 57°20'00.2"W) from October 2021 to June 2022. A completely randomized design was employed with four treatments and seven replications. The treatments consisted of using cover crop species, which were planted in the research area subsequently used to cultivate maize. The cover crops used were Urochloa ruziziensis cv. ruziziensis, Stizolobium pruriens , a mixture ( Urochloa ruziziensis cv. ruziziensis + Stizolobium pruriens ) and a conventional system. The experiment consisted of two stages: first, the installation of the cover crop species, followed by the planting of the maize. Ninety days after planting the cover crop species, the cover crop plants were cut down. Thirty days later, Triple pro DKB360 hybrid maize was sown. The parameters evaluated in the first stage were green weed mass, dry weed mass, green crop mass, and dry crop mass at 90 days after sowing (DAS). In the second stage, the parameters evaluated were green mass of weeds at 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; weed suppression at 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; cover persistence at 0, 20, 35, 50 and 65 DAS; plant height at 35 and 110 DAS; number of grain rows per ear; number of grains per row; and yield. Variance analysis was carried out on the data using the F-test at 5%, and Tukey’s test at 5% was used to compare the means of the treatments. The mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriens significantly reduced weed biomass by 43.2% compared to the conventional system and showed the highest weed suppression and cover persistence up to 65 days after sowing. Moreover, this mixture produced the highest maize yield (8.42 Mg ha -1 ), representing a 39.4% increase over the conventional system. Treatments with U. ruziziensis alone also outperformed the control, while S. pruriens alone had limited effectiveness. These results highlight the potential of using mixed cover species as a sustainable weed management strategy that enhances maize productivity in smallholder systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriens reduced weed biomass by 43.2% compared with the conventional system.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriense2
Interactor
weede2weed
Second interactor
U. ruziziensisUrochloa ruziziensise2other
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
43.2%e2
Comparator
conventional systeme2
Setting
field conditions in Concepción, Paraguaye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa ruziziensis
Urochloa ruziziensis · Second interactorKym Nicolson · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e2

“The mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriens significantly reduced weed biomass by 43.2% compared to the conventional system and showed the highest weed suppression and cover persistence up to 65 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture produced the highest maize yield, 8.42 Mg ha -1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
mixturee3
Outcome
maize yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
8.42 Mg ha -1e3
Comparator
conventional systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e3

“this mixture produced the highest maize yield (8.42 Mg ha -1 ), representing a 39.4% increase over the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture increased maize yield by 39.4% over the conventional system.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
mixturee3
Outcome
maize yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
39.4%e3
Comparator
conventional systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e3

“this mixture produced the highest maize yield (8.42 Mg ha -1 ), representing a 39.4% increase over the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture showed the highest weed suppression and cover persistence up to 65 days after sowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriense2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed suppression and cover persistencee2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
up to 65 days after sowinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e2

“The mixture of U. ruziziensis and S. pruriens significantly reduced weed biomass by 43.2% compared to the conventional system and showed the highest weed suppression and cover persistence up to 65 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments with U. ruziziensis alone outperformed the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
U. ruziziensis alonee4
Outcome
outperformed the controle4
Direction
outperformede4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatments with U. ruziziensis alone also outperformed the control, while S. pruriens alone had limited effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. pruriens alone had limited effectiveness.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
S. pruriens alonee4
Outcome
effectivenesse4
Direction
limitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatments with U. ruziziensis alone also outperformed the control, while S. pruriens alone had limited effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1981 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cover species are a potential sustainable weed management strategy that enhances maize productivity in smallholder systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
using mixed cover species as a sustainable weed management strategye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“maize productivity under field conditions in Concepción, Paraguay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–190 · show in text ↑
e5

“These results highlight the potential of using mixed cover species as a sustainable weed management strategy that enhances maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2124 · show in text ↑

Urochloa ruziziensis · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mucuna pruriens · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.