Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Marine microalgae extracts as plant biostimulant to boost baby leaf lettuce production

Annamaria Di Serio; Vincenzo Alfano; Aldo Tava; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The application of biostimulants derived from microalgae may represent a promising strategy to enhance fruit and vegetable yields, particularly in the context of ongoing climate change. Yet, comprehensive studies assessing the efficacy of specific marine microalgae species on leafy vegetable crops are still limited. Addressing this gap, the present work aimed to evaluate the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Extracts from both species were first chemically characterized and then applied via foliar spray in aqueous solution. At the end of the cultivation cycle, both treatments significantly enhanced nitrogen assimilation and water uptake, leading to increased biomass production. Notably, plants treated with microalgae extracts exhibited higher fresh weight (+ 31%), increased leaf number and plant height. Additionally, both treatments improved nutrient use efficiency and contributed to more effective water management. Gene expression analysis further revealed that extracts from N. gaditana and Porphyridium sp. modulated the expression of genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilation, supporting the observed improvement in nitrogen agronomic efficiency in lettuce. Collectively, these findings support the potential of N. gaditana and Porphyridium sp. as eco-friendly biostimulants capable of enhancing the sustainability and efficiency of leafy vegetable production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both microalgae extract treatments significantly enhanced nitrogen assimilation and water uptake in baby leaf lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp.e0
Outcome
nitrogen assimilation and water uptakee1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“both treatments significantly enhanced nitrogen assimilation and water uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both microalgae extract treatments led to increased biomass production in baby leaf lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp.e0
Outcome
biomass productione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“leading to increased biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with microalgae extracts had higher fresh weight (+31%).

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
microalgae extractse1
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
+ 31%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants treated with microalgae extracts exhibited higher fresh weight (+ 31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with microalgae extracts had increased leaf number and plant height.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
microalgae extractse1
Outcome
leaf number and plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants treated with microalgae extracts exhibited higher fresh weight (+ 31%), increased leaf number and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both treatments improved nutrient use efficiency and contributed to more effective water management.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp.e0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of two marine microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana and Porphyridium sp. on the growth and quality of baby leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–523 · show in text ↑
e1

“both treatments improved nutrient use efficiency and contributed to more effective water management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts from N. gaditana and Porphyridium sp. modulated the expression of genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilation in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
extracts from N. gaditana and Porphyridium sp.e0
Outcome
expression of genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilatione0
Direction
modulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extracts from N. gaditana and Porphyridium sp. modulated the expression of genes involved in nitrogen uptake and assimilation, supporting the observed improvement in nitrogen agronomic efficiency in lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1296 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 114 positive, 157 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.