Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Wheat yield and soil physicochemical properties through mineral nitrogen and vermicompost application in Lasta district, North Ethiopia

Ewunetie Melak; Eyayu Molla; Tesfaye Feyisa; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Ethiopia’s soils are losing essential nutrients and organic matter, causing a drop in agricultural output. This experiment was therefore conducted to evaluate the effect of combining mineral nitrogen (N) and vermicompost (VC) on bread wheat yield and soil physicochemical properties in the Lasta district. During the 2023 cropping season, the trial employed a factorial design with varying levels of N (0%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of recommended) and VC (0%, 50%, and 100% equivalent to N) on a farmer’s field. The soil samples were analyzed before and after treatment, and the data were analyzed using R software. The results indicated that the total N (TN) (0.131 ± 0.01%) and available phosphorus (Av. P) (22.97 ± 0.05) were recorded from 100% VC, the highest organic carbon (OC) (1.79 ± 0.01%) and CEC (36.8 ± 1.0 cmol+/kg) of the soil were recorded for the combined N and VC application, whereas the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control. The highest grain (3955.33 ± 49.22 kg ha −1 ) and biomass (9.30 ± 0.1 t ha −1 ) yields were obtained with full N and VC application, while the lowest were observed in the control. Economic analysis revealed that applying fully recommended N with 100% VC as the N equivalent led to the highest net profit (290088.91 ETB) and acceptable marginal rate of return (1491.24%). It is recommended that farmers adopt 100% of the recommended N with 100% VC equivalence for optimal yields. Further research across diverse locations and years is suggested to validate and understand the residual effects on soil and yield improvements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full vermicompost gave soil total nitrogen of 0.131 ± 0.01%.

Treatment
100% VCe0
Outcome
total N (TN)e0
Direction
loweste1
Value
0.131 ± 0.01%e0
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Lasta district, North Ethiopiat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total N (TN) (0.131 ± 0.01%) and available phosphorus (Av. P) (22.97 ± 0.05) were recorded from 100% VC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat yield and soil physicochemical properties through mineral nitrogen and vermicompost application in Lasta district, North Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full vermicompost gave soil available phosphorus of 22.97 ± 0.05.

Treatment
100% VCe0
Outcome
available phosphorus (Av. P)e0
Value
22.97 ± 0.05e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus (Av. P) (22.97 ± 0.05) were recorded from 100% VC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and vermicompost gave the highest soil organic carbon.

Treatment
combined N and VC applicatione0
Outcome
organic carbon (OC)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.79 ± 0.01%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest organic carbon (OC) (1.79 ± 0.01%) and CEC (36.8 ± 1.0 cmol+/kg) of the soil were recorded for the combined N and VC application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and vermicompost gave the highest soil CEC.

Treatment
combined N and VC applicatione0
Outcome
CECe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
36.8 ± 1.0 cmol+/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest organic carbon (OC) (1.79 ± 0.01%) and CEC (36.8 ± 1.0 cmol+/kg) of the soil were recorded for the combined N and VC application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil had the lowest total nitrogen.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.107 ± 0.01%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil had the lowest available phosphorus.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
Av. Pe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.17 ± 0.21e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil had the lowest organic carbon.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
OCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.05 ± 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control soil had the lowest CEC.

Treatment
controle0
Outcome
CECe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
23.37 ± 1.26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest TN (0.107 ± 0.01%) Av. P (19.17 ± 0.21), OC (1.05 ± 0.01) and CEC (23.37 ± 1.26) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full nitrogen and vermicompost gave the highest grain yield.

Treatment
full N and VC applicatione0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3955.33 ± 49.22 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain (3955.33 ± 49.22 kg ha −1 ) and biomass (9.30 ± 0.1 t ha −1 ) yields were obtained with full N and VC application, while the lowest were observed in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full nitrogen and vermicompost gave the highest biomass yield.

Treatment
full N and VC applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.30 ± 0.1 t ha −1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain (3955.33 ± 49.22 kg ha −1 ) and biomass (9.30 ± 0.1 t ha −1 ) yields were obtained with full N and VC application, while the lowest were observed in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended nitrogen plus full vermicompost gave the highest net profit.

Treatment
fully recommended N with 100% VC as the N equivalente0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
290088.91 ETBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying fully recommended N with 100% VC as the N equivalent led to the highest net profit (290088.91 ETB) and acceptable marginal rate of return (1491.24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended nitrogen plus full vermicompost gave an acceptable marginal rate of return.

Treatment
fully recommended N with 100% VC as the N equivalente0
Outcome
marginal rate of returne0
Direction
acceptablee0
Value
1491.24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying fully recommended N with 100% VC as the N equivalent led to the highest net profit (290088.91 ETB) and acceptable marginal rate of return (1491.24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers should use full recommended nitrogen with full vermicompost equivalence for optimal yields.

Outcome
adopt 100% of the recommended N with 100% VC equivalence for optimal yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is recommended that farmers adopt 100% of the recommended N with 100% VC equivalence for optimal yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.