Abstract
Gross primary productivity (GPP) is a key indicator for assessing carbon uptake capacity and photosynthetic productivity in agricultural ecosystems, playing a crucial role in regional carbon cycle evaluation and sustainable agriculture development. However, traditional mechanistic light use efficiency (LUE) models exhibit variable accuracy under different climatic conditions and crop types. Machine learning models, while demonstrating strong fitting capabilities, heavily depend on the selection of input features and data availability. This study focuses on winter wheat in the Guanzhong region, utilizing continuous field observation data from the 2020–2022 growing seasons to develop five machine learning models: Ridge Regression (Ridge), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GB), and a stacking-based ensemble learning model (LSM). These models were compared with the LUE model under two scenarios, excluding and including solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), to evaluate the contribution of SIF to GPP estimation accuracy. The results indicate significant differences in GPP estimation performance among the machine learning models, with LSM outperforming others in both scenarios. Without SIF, LSM achieved an average R2 of 0.87, surpassing individual models (0.72–0.83), demonstrating strong stability and generalization ability. With SIF inclusion, all machine learning models showed marked accuracy improvements, with LSM’s average R2 rising to 0.91, highlighting SIF’s critical role in capturing photosynthetic dynamics. Although the LUE model approached machine learning model accuracy in some growth stages, its overall performance was limited by structural constraints. This study demonstrates that ensemble learning methods integrating multi-source observations offer significant advantages for high-precision winter wheat GPP estimation, and that incorporating SIF as a physiological indicator further enhances model robustness and predictive capacity. The findings validate the potential of combining ensemble learning and photosynthetic physiological parameters to improve GPP retrieval accuracy, providing a reliable technical pathway for agricultural ecosystem carbon flux estimation and informing strategies for climate change adaptation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
LSM outperformed other machine learning models in both scenarios.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“LSM outperforming others in both scenarios”
Claim · model-written summary
Without SIF, LSM averaged R2 0.87 and exceeded individual models.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Without SIF, LSM achieved an average R2 of 0.87, surpassing individual models (0.72–0.83)”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding SIF improved the accuracy of all machine learning models.
Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“With SIF inclusion, all machine learning models showed marked accuracy improvements”
Claim · model-written summary
With SIF, LSM average R2 rose to 0.91.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“LSM’s average R2 rising to 0.91”
Claim · model-written summary
LUE model accuracy approached machine learning accuracy in some growth stages.
Verbatim
e0“the LUE model approached machine learning model accuracy in some growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Overall LUE model performance was limited.
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“its overall performance was limited by structural constraints”