Paper · 2025 · Faktori eksperimental noi evolucii organizmiv

Analysis of physiological-biochemical indicators that cause the increase in osmo-resistance of genetically modified wheat

S. I. Mykhalska; A. G. Komisarenko

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the physiological and biochemical characteristics of the seed generation (T4) of genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with a double-stranded RNA suppressor of the proline dehydrogenase (pdh) gene under osmotic stress. Methods. Proline dehydrogenase (PDH) activity assay, free L-proline (Pro) content; carbohydrates and protein. Results. The activity of proline dehydrogenase, the content of proline, proteins and carbohydrates under conditions of normal irrigation, water deficit and irrigation restoration were determined. Conclusions. It has been shown that genetically modified plants with partial suppression of pdh demonstrate changes in the complex of physiological and biochemical parameters that contribute to increased osmototoxicity. They are characterized by reduced activity of proline dehydrogenase and increased levels of proline. During dehydration, the level of Pro in T4 plants increased and remained elevated in the first hours after rehydration, which contributed to maintaining carbohydrate balance. The sucrose/monosaccharide ratio in transgenic variants remained stable regardless of cultivation conditions. Analysis of protein content showed that under optimal hydration, its level in T4 plants and the original genotypes did not differ significantly. At the same time, in control plants under water stress conditions, an increase in protein content was observed, which may indicate activation of the synthesis of stress response proteins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetically modified wheat with partial pdh suppression showed reduced proline dehydrogenase activity.

Treatment
partial suppression of pdhe1
Gene
pdhe1
Outcome
activity of proline dehydrogenasee2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“genetically modified plants with partial suppression of pdh demonstrate changes in the complex of physiological and biochemical parameters that contribute to increased osmototoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–775 · show in text ↑
e2

“They are characterized by reduced activity of proline dehydrogenase and increased levels of proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetically modified wheat with partial pdh suppression showed increased proline levels.

Treatment
partial suppression of pdhe1
Outcome
levels of prolinee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“genetically modified plants with partial suppression of pdh demonstrate changes in the complex of physiological and biochemical parameters that contribute to increased osmototoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–775 · show in text ↑
e2

“They are characterized by reduced activity of proline dehydrogenase and increased levels of proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During dehydration, proline level in T4 wheat plants increased and stayed elevated in the first hours after rehydration.

Material
T4 plantse3
Treatment
dehydratione3
Outcome
the level of Proe3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
remained elevated in the first hours after rehydratione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“During dehydration, the level of Pro in T4 plants increased and remained elevated in the first hours after rehydration, which contributed to maintaining carbohydrate balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1051 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in proline in T4 wheat plants is associated with maintaining carbohydrate balance during dehydration.

Compound
Proe3
Outcome
maintaining carbohydrate balancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e3

“During dehydration, the level of Pro in T4 plants increased and remained elevated in the first hours after rehydration, which contributed to maintaining carbohydrate balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sucrose to monosaccharide ratio in transgenic wheat remained stable regardless of cultivation conditions.

Material
transgenic variantse4
Outcome
sucrose/monosaccharide ratioe4
Qualifier
regardless of cultivation conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e4

“The sucrose/monosaccharide ratio in transgenic variants remained stable regardless of cultivation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal hydration, protein content in T4 wheat plants and the original genotypes did not differ significantly.

Material
T4 plantse5
Treatment
optimal hydratione5
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
did not differe5
Comparator
the original genotypese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e5

“Analysis of protein content showed that under optimal hydration, its level in T4 plants and the original genotypes did not differ significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In control wheat plants under water stress, protein content increased.

Material
control plantse6
Treatment
water stress conditionse6
Outcome
protein contente6
Direction
an increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e6

“in control plants under water stress conditions, an increase in protein content was observed, which may indicate activation of the synthesis of stress response proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1494 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protein increase under water stress may indicate activation of stress response protein synthesis in wheat.

Outcome
protein contente6
Qualifier
activation of the synthesis of stress response proteinse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetically modified wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–150 · show in text ↑
e6

“in control plants under water stress conditions, an increase in protein content was observed, which may indicate activation of the synthesis of stress response proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1494 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.