Paper · 2025 · Fermentation

Effect of Inoculation of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Fibrolytic Enzymes on Microbiota in the Terminal and Aerobically Exposed Short-Growing Season Whole-Plant Corn Silage

Chunli Li; Jayakrishnan Nair; Eric Chevaux; et al.

12
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage ensiled in a temperate zone. Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I) with a mixture of LAB containing 1.5 × 105 colony-forming units (cfu)/g Lentilactobacillus hilgardii, 1.5 × 105 cfu/g of Lentilactobacillus buchneri, and 1.0 × 105 cfu/g Pediococcus pentosaceus plus a combination of xylanase + β-glucanase. Silage samples were taken after ensiling in bag silos for 418 days (terminal silage; TS), with subsamples of TS subsequently exposed to air for 14 days (aerobically exposed silage; AS). Regardless of treatment, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiome, whilst Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the predominant phyla in the fungal microbiome in both TS and AS. Lactobacillus, Acetobacter, and Bacillus were the most abundant bacterial genera, whilst Candida, Aspergillus, Vishniacozyma, Pichia, and Issatchenkia were the most abundant fungal genera. Use of silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure, but decreased (p < 0.01) the relative abundance (RA) of Proteobacteria in both TS and AS, increased (p < 0.01) RA of Firmicutes in AS, but did not affect the RA of fungal phyla in either TS or AS. At the genus level, the additive significantly decreased (p < 0.01) RA of Acetobacter in both TS and AS. The silage additive used in this study significantly affected the composition of multiple microbial genera during ensiling and aerobic exposure by shifting bacterial communities towards enhanced aerobic stability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure.

Treatment
silage additivee2
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversitye2
Direction
did not changee2
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in both terminal and aerobically exposed silage.

Treatment
silage additivee2
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance (RA) of Proteobacteriae3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1315 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased (p < 0.01) the relative abundance (RA) of Proteobacteria in both TS and AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes in aerobically exposed silage.

Treatment
silage additivee2
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
RA of Firmicutese4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1315 · show in text ↑
e4

“increased (p < 0.01) RA of Firmicutes in AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive did not affect the relative abundance of fungal phyla in terminal or aerobically exposed silage.

Treatment
silage additivee2
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
RA of fungal phylae5
Direction
did not affecte5
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of silage additive did not change bacterial or fungal alpha or beta diversity during ensiling or aerobic exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1315 · show in text ↑
e5

“did not affect the RA of fungal phyla in either TS or AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive significantly decreased the relative abundance of Acetobacter in both terminal and aerobically exposed silage.

Treatment
additivee6
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
RA of Acetobactere6
Direction
significantly decreasede6
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the genus level, the additive significantly decreased (p < 0.01) RA of Acetobacter in both TS and AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The silage additive significantly affected the composition of multiple microbial genera and shifted bacterial communities towards enhanced aerobic stability.

Treatment
silage additive used in this studye7
Interactor
lactic acid bacteria (LAB)e0symbiont
Outcome
composition of multiple microbial generae7
Direction
significantly affectede7
Qualifier
shifting bacterial communities towards enhanced aerobic stabilitye7
Comparator
uninoculated (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short-season corn forage was either uninoculated (C) or inoculated (I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–332 · show in text ↑
e7

“The silage additive used in this study significantly affected the composition of multiple microbial genera during ensiling and aerobic exposure by shifting bacterial communities towards enhanced aerobic stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiome of corn silage.

Outcome
predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiomee1
Qualifier
Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of treatment, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria was a predominant phylum in the bacterial microbiome of corn silage.

Outcome
predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiomee1
Qualifier
Actinobacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of treatment, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the predominant phyla in the bacterial microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were predominant phyla in the fungal microbiome of corn silage.

Outcome
predominant phyla in the fungal microbiomee1
Qualifier
Ascomycota and Basidiomycotae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the predominant phyla in the fungal microbiome in both TS and AS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus, Acetobacter and Bacillus were the most abundant bacterial genera in corn silage.

Outcome
most abundant bacterial generae1
Qualifier
Lactobacillus, Acetobacter, and Bacilluse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lactobacillus, Acetobacter, and Bacillus were the most abundant bacterial genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1089 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Candida, Aspergillus and Vishniacozyma were the most abundant fungal genera in corn silage.

Outcome
most abundant fungal generae1
Qualifier
Candida, Aspergillus, Vishniacozymae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Candida, Aspergillus, Vishniacozyma, Pichia, and Issatchenkia were the most abundant fungal genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia and Issatchenkia were among the most abundant fungal genera in corn silage.

Outcome
most abundant fungal generae1
Qualifier
Pichia, and Issatchenkiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of mixed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) on bacterial and fungal communities in terminal and aerobically exposed whole-plant corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“Candida, Aspergillus, Vishniacozyma, Pichia, and Issatchenkia were the most abundant fungal genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1196 · show in text ↑

processing · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

processing · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.