Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Plant growth-promoting effect of seed biopriming of local Bacillus thuringiensis isolates on Cicer arietinum L.

Utkarsh G Ingle; Shreshtha Saxena; MP Moharil; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation aimed to evaluate the influence of seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates on germination and early seedling growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218). Twenty-one indigenous Bt isolates, along with a standard Bt-HD-1 strain, were tested under laboratory conditions using the paper towel method. Results revealed that several Bt strains significantly enhanced seed performance compared to the untreated control. Notably, PDKV-Bt-SBn-2, PDKV-Bt-SAk-12, PDKV-Bt-SDA-1, and PDKV-Bt-SA-22 recorded faster emergence, higher germination rates, longer root and shoot lengths, and superior vigour indices. Improvements included a reduction of nearly one day in emergence, 13-14% higher germination, and up to 9-11 cm greater seedling length compared to control. These findings demonstrate that indigenous Bt strains not only promote early establishment but also enhance vigour and resilience. Hence, Bt-based biopriming represents a promising, cost-effective, and eco-friendly strategy for sustainable chickpea production under diverse agro-climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Several Bt strains significantly improved seed performance over the untreated control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Jaki-9218e1
Treatment
Bt strainse0
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2symbiont
Outcome
seed performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several Bt strains significantly enhanced seed performance compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four named Bt isolates produced faster emergence, higher germination, longer roots and shoots, and higher vigour indices.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
PDKV-Bt-SBn-2, PDKV-Bt-SAk-12, PDKV-Bt-SDA-1, and PDKV-Bt-SA-22e0
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2symbiont
Outcome
faster emergence, higher germination rates, longer root and shoot lengths, and superior vigour indicese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PDKV-Bt-SBn-2, PDKV-Bt-SAk-12, PDKV-Bt-SDA-1, and PDKV-Bt-SA-22 recorded faster emergence, higher germination rates, longer root and shoot lengths, and superior vigour indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming reduced emergence time by nearly one day relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolatese2
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2symbiont
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
nearly one daye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction of nearly one day in emergence, 13-14% higher germination, and up to 9-11 cm greater seedling length compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming increased germination by 13-14% relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolatese2
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2symbiont
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
13-14%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13-14% higher germination, and up to 9-11 cm greater seedling length compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming increased seedling length by up to 9-11 cm relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolatese2
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise2symbiont
Outcome
seedling lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
up to 9-11 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 9-11 cm greater seedling length compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L., variety Jaki-9218)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed biopriming with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–118 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.