Paper · 2025 · LWT

Single-pulse silicic acid immersion for extending the shelf life of lettuce

Zhihao Pang; Li-Xue Qiu; Yuxiao Wang; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fresh produce is nutritious but perishable. This study investigated the efficacy of single-pulse silicic acid immersion for extending shelf life and examined the underlying physiological and microbial mechanisms. A concentration gradient of 0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 mM silicic acid was evaluated, with 10 mM determined as optimal considering both efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Following single-pulse immersion in 10 mM silicic acid for 1 minute, lettuce stored at 25 °C for 5 days exhibited only 5% weight loss, substantially lower than the 16% observed in controls. SEM-EDS analysis confirmed silicon deposition on leaf surfaces. Silicon application increased chlorophyll content by 38% and vitamin C by 13%, while reducing nitrite levels by 91% below safety standards. Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, POD) increased by 74%–383%. Microbial analysis revealed 83% reduction in bacterial load, altered β-diversity, and decreased spoilage-associated microorganisms including Pseudomonas , Stenotrophomonas , and Pantoea . Washing removed 31% of deposited silicon, ensuring consumer safety with silicon intake far below established thresholds. The method demonstrated broad applicability: cherry tomatoes and Kyoho grapes showed negligible decay after 5 days, with hardness increasing by 38% and 30%, respectively. Single-pulse silicic acid immersion provides a non-toxic approach for extending produce shelf life while maintaining nutritional quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce immersed once in 10 mM silicic acid for 1 minute and stored at 25 °C for 5 days lost only 5% weight versus 16% in controls.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
single-pulse immersion in 10 mM silicic acid for 1 minutee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
16% observed in controlse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Following single-pulse immersion in 10 mM silicic acid for 1 minute, lettuce stored at 25 °C for 5 days exhibited only 5% weight loss, substantially lower than the 16% observed in controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–563 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the silicic acid concentrations tested (0 to 20 mM), 10 mM was determined optimal considering efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
efficacy and cost-effectivenesse0
Value
10 mMe0
Qualifier
optimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 10 mM determined as optimal considering both efficacy and cost-effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SEM-EDS analysis confirmed silicon deposition on leaf surfaces.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
leaf surfacese0
Outcome
silicon depositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“SEM-EDS analysis confirmed silicon deposition on leaf surfaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased lettuce chlorophyll content by 38%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Silicon applicatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll content by 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application increased lettuce vitamin C by 13%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Silicon applicatione0
Outcome
vitamin Ce1
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“vitamin C by 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application reduced nitrite levels in lettuce by 91%, below safety standards.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Silicon applicatione0
Outcome
nitrite levelse1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
91%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Silicon application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing nitrite levels by 91% below safety standards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, POD) increased by 74%-383%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, POD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
74%–383%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, POD) increased by 74%–383%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial analysis revealed an 83% reduction in bacterial load.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
bacterial loade0
Direction
reductione0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“83% reduction in bacterial load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial analysis revealed altered β-diversity.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
β-diversitye0
Qualifier
alterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“altered β-diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spoilage-associated microorganisms including Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Pantoea decreased.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0other
Second interactor
StenotrophomonasStenotrophomonase0other
Outcome
spoilage-associated microorganismse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Pantoeae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Stenotrophomonas
Stenotrophomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Riraq25 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“decreased spoilage-associated microorganisms including Pseudomonas , Stenotrophomonas , and Pantoea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing removed 31% of the deposited silicon.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Washinge0
Outcome
deposited silicone0
Direction
removede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Washing removed 31% of deposited silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon intake from washed lettuce was far below established thresholds.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
silicon intakee0
Qualifier
far below established thresholdse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“silicon intake far below established thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherry tomatoes treated with single-pulse silicic acid showed negligible decay after 5 days.

Outcome
decaye1
Qualifier
negligiblee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed negligible decay after 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kyoho grapes treated with single-pulse silicic acid showed negligible decay after 5 days.

Taxon
Kyoho grapese0
Outcome
decaye1
Qualifier
negligiblee1

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed negligible decay after 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness of cherry tomatoes increased by 38% after treatment.

Outcome
hardnesse1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
38%e1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“hardness increasing by 38% and 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness of Kyoho grapes increased by 30% after treatment.

Taxon
Kyoho grapese0
Outcome
hardnesse1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
30%e1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Kyoho grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“hardness increasing by 38% and 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1302 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.