Paper · 2013 · Advances in Horticultural Science

Effect of mulching and plant density on out-of-season organic potato growth, yield and quality

G. Caruso; D. Carputo; S. Conti; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Research was carried out on potato (Solanum tuberosum L., cv. Spunta) growing in the field in the Campania region (southern Italy) in 2007 and 2008, adopting organic farming practices, in order to evaluate the effects of two mulching treatments (black biodegradable film and bare soil) and six plant densities (12.5, 10.0, 8.3, 7.1, 6.2 and, as a control, 5.3 plants per m2) on growth, yield and quality of “new potato” winter-spring and summer-autumn crops. Only in the case of the summer-autumn crop cycle, mulching resulted in a higher yield, plant dry matter and leaf area compared with the bare soil control, while in both crop cycles this latter treatment induced a delay in harvest. The winter-spring cycle gave a higher production of 40-70 mm tubers, while the summer-autumn cycle resulted in a higher vitamin C content. For the winter-spring crop cycle, the plant density of 8.3 plants·m-2 resulted in the highest yield for food-use tubers, whereas the highest production of seed tubers was obtained with a density of 12.5 plants·m-2. The plant density of 8.3 plants·m-2 also resulted in the highest plant dry matter and leaf area. For the summer-autumn crop cycle, the 10 plants·m-2 density gave the highest production of 40-70 mm calibre tubers, as well as the highest plant dry matter and leaf area. In this cycle, the 6.3 plants·m-2 density resulted in the highest production of 70-80 mm calibre tubers. In terms of cost effectiveness, the choice of biodegradable mulching could save the expense of manual weed control and, in the case of the summer-autumn crop cycle, it is also associated with a higher yield. Overall, tuber yield increased with plant density but the final production was also affected by the crop cycle. This may depend on the different environmental conditions and duration which characterized each cultural cycle and, therefore, affected the vegetative development of organic new potatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased summer-autumn yield versus bare soil.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
summer-autumn crop cyclee0
Comparator
bare soil controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only in the case of the summer-autumn crop cycle, mulching resulted in a higher yield, plant dry matter and leaf area compared with the bare soil control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased summer-autumn plant dry matter and leaf area.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
plant dry matter and leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
summer-autumn crop cyclee0
Comparator
bare soil controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only in the case of the summer-autumn crop cycle, mulching resulted in a higher yield, plant dry matter and leaf area compared with the bare soil control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare soil delayed harvest in both crop cycles.

Treatment
bare soil controle0
Outcome
harveste0
Direction
a delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bare soil control, while in both crop cycles this latter treatment induced a delay in harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter-spring crops produced more 40-70 mm tubers.

Treatment
winter-spring cyclee0
Outcome
production of 40-70 mm tuberse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The winter-spring cycle gave a higher production of 40-70 mm tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer-autumn crops had higher vitamin C content.

Treatment
summer-autumn cyclee0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the summer-autumn cycle resulted in a higher vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8.3 plants·m-2, winter-spring food tuber yield was highest.

Treatment
8.3 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
yield for food-use tuberse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant density of 8.3 plants·m-2 resulted in the highest yield for food-use tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12.5 plants·m-2, winter-spring seed tuber production was highest.

Treatment
12.5 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
production of seed tuberse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest production of seed tubers was obtained with a density of 12.5 plants·m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8.3 plants·m-2, plant dry matter and leaf area were highest.

Treatment
8.3 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
plant dry matter and leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant density of 8.3 plants·m-2 also resulted in the highest plant dry matter and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 plants·m-2, summer-autumn 40-70 mm tuber production was highest.

Treatment
10 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
production of 40-70 mm calibre tuberse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 10 plants·m-2 density gave the highest production of 40-70 mm calibre tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 plants·m-2, summer-autumn plant dry matter and leaf area were highest.

Treatment
10 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
plant dry matter and leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 10 plants·m-2 density gave the highest production of 40-70 mm calibre tubers, as well as the highest plant dry matter and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6.3 plants·m-2, summer-autumn 70-80 mm tuber production was highest.

Treatment
6.3 plants·m-2e0
Outcome
production of 70-80 mm calibre tuberse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 6.3 plants·m-2 density resulted in the highest production of 70-80 mm calibre tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biodegradable mulch could save manual weed-control expense.

Outcome
the choice of biodegradable mulching could save the expense of manual weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the choice of biodegradable mulching could save the expense of manual weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall tuber yield increased with plant density.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, tuber yield increased with plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final production varied with crop cycle.

Treatment
crop cyclee0
Outcome
final productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the final production was also affected by the crop cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

mulching · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.