Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. B, Zoology

Potential Efficacy of Bioformulations of Trichoderma and Bacillus in the Management of Peanut Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne arenaria

Soliman M. El-Sagheer; Ahmed E. Khalifa; Asmaa M. Nagah; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The peanut root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne arenaria is one of the most damage species of nematodes to peanut crop that cause significant losses. The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions. The rates of tested of formulations (2.5, 5 and 10g plant-1) had a significant (P ≤ 0.05) direct or indirect effect on each of the M. arenaria criteria and parameters of plant capacity for growth and production, compared to untreated control and the nematicide (Fothiazate 10%). Results showed that biocontrol T34 achieved the best significant (P ≤0.05) of nematode reduction at 10g plant-1 (92.881%), with 3.117% increase in plant weight. In exchange for 62.268% in Phosphoren and 7.239% in potassiumag. With percentages decrease in the final population amounted to 3.117%, 7.376% and 33.73% of the nematicide. It could be concluded that the application of commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma and Bacillus was useful in suppressing root-knot nematode, M. arenaria, especially when added at the beginning of the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Formulations at 2.5, 5 and 10 g plant-1 had a significant direct or indirect effect on M. arenaria criteria and on peanut growth and production parameters, relative to untreated control and the nematicide Fothiazate 10%.

Treatment
formulations (2.5, 5 and 10g plant-1)e2
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
M. arenaria criteria and parameters of plant capacity for growth and productione2
Comparator
untreated control and the nematicide (Fothiazate 10%)e2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rates of tested of formulations (2.5, 5 and 10g plant-1) had a significant (P ≤ 0.05) direct or indirect effect on each of the M. arenaria criteria and parameters of plant capacity for growth and production, compared to untreated control and the nematicide (Fothiazate 10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol T34 reduced nematode numbers by 92.881%, the best reduction among the tested formulations, in peanut under greenhouse conditions.

Treatment
biocontrol T34e3
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reductione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
92.881%e3
Qualifier
10g plant-1e3
Comparator
untreated controle2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rates of tested of formulations (2.5, 5 and 10g plant-1) had a significant (P ≤ 0.05) direct or indirect effect on each of the M. arenaria criteria and parameters of plant capacity for growth and production, compared to untreated control and the nematicide (Fothiazate 10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–644 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results showed that biocontrol T34 achieved the best significant (P ≤0.05) of nematode reduction at 10g plant-1 (92.881%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol T34 increased peanut plant weight by 3.117% relative to untreated control.

Treatment
biocontrol T34e3
Outcome
plant weighte4
Direction
increasee4
Value
3.117%e4
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rates of tested of formulations (2.5, 5 and 10g plant-1) had a significant (P ≤ 0.05) direct or indirect effect on each of the M. arenaria criteria and parameters of plant capacity for growth and production, compared to untreated control and the nematicide (Fothiazate 10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–644 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results showed that biocontrol T34 achieved the best significant (P ≤0.05) of nematode reduction at 10g plant-1 (92.881%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–767 · show in text ↑
e4

“with 3.117% increase in plant weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphoren reduced nematode numbers by 62.268%, with outcome and direction unresolved in the abstract.

Treatment
Phosphorene5
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Value
62.268%e5

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e5

“In exchange for 62.268% in Phosphoren and 7.239% in potassiumag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassiumag gave 7.239%, with outcome and direction unresolved in the abstract.

Treatment
potassiumage5
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Value
7.239%e5

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e5

“In exchange for 62.268% in Phosphoren and 7.239% in potassiumag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The final M. arenaria population decreased by 3.117%, 7.376% and 33.73% of the nematicide level under the bioformulations.

Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae1pest
Outcome
final populatione6
Direction
decreasee6
Value
3.117%, 7.376% and 33.73%e6
Comparator
the nematicidee6

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e6

“With percentages decrease in the final population amounted to 3.117%, 7.376% and 33.73% of the nematicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–977 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial Trichoderma and Bacillus bioformulations are useful for suppressing root-knot nematode when added at the beginning of the growing season.

Treatment
commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma and Bacilluse7
Interactor
M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae7pest
Outcome
suppressing root-knot nematodee7
Qualifier
especially when added at the beginning of the growing seasone7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne arenaria
Meloidogyne arenaria · InteractorElizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of some commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma (Biocontrol T34) and Bacillus (Rhizo-N, Phosphoren and Potassiumag) for suppression of M. arenaria on peanut was evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–365 · show in text ↑
e7

“It could be concluded that the application of commercial bio-based formulations of Trichoderma and Bacillus was useful in suppressing root-knot nematode, M. arenaria, especially when added at the beginning of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1206 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Meloidogyne arenaria · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.