Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Horticulture and Food Science

Comparative studies of natural, organic, conventional and precision farming on growth and flowering of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)

Shruti B Zankat; KD Patel; DK Varu

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Horticulture Polytechnic, ASPEE College of Horticulture, Navsari Agricultural University, Paria to study the response of planting material and nutrients on growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year 2022-23 and 2023-24. The experiment included fourteen treatment combinations with two factors in a randomized block design with factorial concept and repeated thrice viz., Planting material (P): Tissue cultured plants and Macro propagation plantlets; Nutrients (N): Novel organic liquid nutrients (1 and 2%), Banana Shakti (1 and 2%), Grade IV micronutrient (1 and 2%) and Control. Nutrients were sprayed at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting. The individual effect of planting material and foliar application of nutrients at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting as well as their interactions on growth of banana cv. Grand Naine were recorded. The results of two years mean revealed that tissue cultured plants used as a planting material significantly increased the growth characters viz., maximum pseudostem girth (71.74 cm), number of leaves (14.27), leaf area (12.73 m2) and minimum days to shooting, harvesting as well as crop duration (214.14, 102.63 and 316.77 days, respectively). The foliar application of Grade IV micronutrient @ 2% at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting significantly gave the maximum pseudostem height and girth (2.14 m and 72.52 cm, respectively), number of leaves (14.41), leaf area (12.78 m2) and minimum days to shooting, harvesting and crop duration (211.54, 101.40 and 312.94 days, respectively). While, interaction between planting material and nutrients found non-significant on growth characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants had maximum pseudostem girth of 71.74 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
tissue cultured plantse0
Outcome
pseudostem girthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71.74 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tissue cultured plants used as a planting material significantly increased the growth characters viz., maximum pseudostem girth (71.74 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants had 14.27 leaves.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
14.27e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (14.27)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants had leaf area of 12.73 m2.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Value
12.73 m2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (12.73 m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants reached shooting in 214.14 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
days to shootinge0
Direction
minimume0
Value
214.14e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting as well as crop duration (214.14, 102.63 and 316.77 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants reached harvest in 102.63 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
harvestinge0
Direction
minimume0
Value
102.63e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting as well as crop duration (214.14, 102.63 and 316.77 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue cultured banana plants had crop duration of 316.77 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
316.77 dayse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting as well as crop duration (214.14, 102.63 and 316.77 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% produced maximum pseudostem height of 2.14 m.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Grade IV micronutrient @ 2%e0
Outcome
pseudostem heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.14 me0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grade IV micronutrient @ 2% at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting significantly gave the maximum pseudostem height and girth (2.14 m and 72.52 cm, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% produced maximum pseudostem girth of 72.52 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Grade IV micronutrient @ 2%e0
Outcome
pseudostem height and girthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
72.52 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Grade IV micronutrient @ 2% at 3rd, 5th and 7th month after planting significantly gave the maximum pseudostem height and girth (2.14 m and 72.52 cm, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% produced 14.41 leaves.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
14.41e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (14.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% produced leaf area of 12.78 m2.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Value
12.78 m2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (12.78 m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% shortened shooting to 211.54 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
days to shootinge0
Direction
minimume0
Value
211.54e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting and crop duration (211.54, 101.40 and 312.94 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% shortened harvest to 101.40 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
harvestinge0
Direction
minimume0
Value
101.40e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting and crop duration (211.54, 101.40 and 312.94 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade IV micronutrient at 2% shortened crop duration to 312.94 days.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
312.94 dayse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days to shooting, harvesting and crop duration (211.54, 101.40 and 312.94 days, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting material and nutrient application did not significantly interact for growth traits.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
planting material and nutrientse0
Outcome
growth characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between planting material and nutrients found non-significant on growth characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1680 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth of banana cv. Grand Naine during the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–240 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · growth · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Arka banana special gave the highest pseudostem height.

    Influence of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Banana · 2017 · compared with foliar application micronutrients and soil application

    Same direction

  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.