Paper · 2025 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Far-UVC and Violet Irradiation on the Microbial Contamination of Spinach Leaves and Their Vitamin C and Chlorophyll Contents

Alexander Gerdt; Anna-Maria Gierke; Petra Vatter; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Microbial contamination of food can lead to faster spoilage and infections. Therefore, disinfection processes are required that have a low detrimental effect on the nutritional content. Concerning radiation disinfection, two spectral ranges have recently become important. The Far-UVC spectral range, with a wavelength below 230 nm and visible violet light. In this study, leaf spinach was used to investigate the extent to which these radiations inactivate Escherichia coli, but also to determine if the vitamin C or chlorophyll content was reduced. Frozen spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea) were contaminated with E. coli × pGLO and irradiated with either a 222 nm krypton chloride lamp or 405 nm LEDs. The achieved bacterial reduction was determined by plating the irradiated samples on agar plates and subsequent colony counting. The vitamin C concentration was determined by means of redox titration, and the concentrations of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were determined using spectrometry. Both irradiations exhibited a strong antimicrobial impact on E. coli. The average log reduction doses were about 19 mJ/cm2 (222 nm) and 87 J/cm2 (405 nm), respectively. The vitamin C concentration decreased by 30% (222 nm) or 20% (405 nm), and the chlorophyll concentrations decreased by about 25%. Both irradiation approaches are able to substantially reduce microorganisms on spinach leaves by two orders of magnitude, but this is associated with a reduction in the nutrient content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both irradiation wavelengths strongly reduced E. coli on spinach leaves.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
222 nm krypton chloride lamp or 405 nm LEDse1
Interactor
E. coliEscherichia colie0pathogen
Outcome
antimicrobial impact on E. colie0
Direction
stronge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both irradiations exhibited a strong antimicrobial impact on E. coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea) were contaminated with E. coli × pGLO and irradiated with either a 222 nm krypton chloride lamp or 405 nm LEDs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average log reduction dose for 222 nm irradiation was about 19 mJ/cm2.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
222 nme0
Interactor
E. coliEscherichia colie1pathogen
Outcome
log reduction dosese0
Value
19 mJ/cm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average log reduction doses were about 19 mJ/cm2 (222 nm) and 87 J/cm2 (405 nm), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea) were contaminated with E. coli × pGLO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–630 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average log reduction dose for 405 nm irradiation was 87 J/cm2.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
405 nme0
Interactor
E. coliEscherichia colie1pathogen
Outcome
log reduction dosese0
Value
87 J/cm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · InteractorNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average log reduction doses were about 19 mJ/cm2 (222 nm) and 87 J/cm2 (405 nm), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea) were contaminated with E. coli × pGLO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C concentration decreased by 30% after 222 nm irradiation.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
222 nme0
Outcome
vitamin C concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vitamin C concentration decreased by 30% (222 nm) or 20% (405 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C concentration decreased by 20% after 405 nm irradiation.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
405 nme0
Outcome
vitamin C concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vitamin C concentration decreased by 30% (222 nm) or 20% (405 nm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentrations decreased by about 25% after irradiation.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae2
Treatment
irradiationse1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll concentrations decreased by about 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both irradiations exhibited a strong antimicrobial impact on E. coli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1068 · show in text ↑
e2

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The irradiation approaches reduced microorganisms on spinach leaves by two orders of magnitude.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceae1
Treatment
irradiation approachese0
Outcome
microorganisms on spinach leavese0
Direction
reducee0
Value
two orders of magnitudee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both irradiation approaches are able to substantially reduce microorganisms on spinach leaves by two orders of magnitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1419 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–592 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.