Paper · 2025 · Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)

Variegated alfalfa seed yield depending on sowing methods in the Cis-middle Urals

N. I. Kasatkina; Zh. S. Nelyubina

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the research was to study the influence of sowing methods (cover crop, sowing method) of variegated alfalfa Victoria on its seed productivity in the Cis-Middle Urals. The research was conducted in 2019–2023 on sod-podzolic medium loamy soil of the Udmurt Republic. Meteorological conditions of the growing seasons during the research years were contrasting. The regrowth of alfalfa was noted on average in the 2nd-3rd decade of April, harvesting for seeds was carried out in the 1st-2nd decade of September, the vegetation period lasted 124–142 days. Over four years of using the grass stand, it was found that variable alfalfa forms seed productivity at a fairly high level: in the first year of use – 570-759 kg/ha, in subsequent years – 234–309 kg/ha. On average, the highest seed yield was obtained when sowing in wide rows (60 cm) in variants with cover crops of spring wheat (360 kg/ha) and vetch-oat mixture for green mass (359 kg/ha), with the formation of the following structural elements: the number of generative shoots - 238 and 279 pcs/m 2 , the number of brushes on a shoot – 16.0 and 15.5 pcs, pods on a brush – 6.9 and 7.9 pcs, seeds in a pod – 3.3 and 2.8 pcs, the weight of 1000 seeds is 1.94 and 1.96 g, respectively. The number of brushes on a shoot and the number of pods on a brush had an average positive effect on the yield level, correlation coefficients r=0.47 and r=0.53, respectively. Laboratory seed germination in the harvest was at the level of 77–90 %. Relatively the highest germination (90 %) was in wide-row sowings with row spacing of 60 and 30 cm in the variant with a vetch-oat mixture. When cultivating alfalfa for seed purposes, the most energy-efficient method is to use a vetch-oat mixture as a cover crop (energy efficiency coefficient – 5.65); coverless sowing is economically advantageous (profitability level – 556 %).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa regrowth occurred in the second to third decade of April.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
regrowthe0
Value
2nd-3rd decade of Aprile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regrowth of alfalfa was noted on average in the 2nd-3rd decade of April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vegetation period lasted 124–142 days.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
vegetation periode0
Value
124–142 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the vegetation period lasted 124–142 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year alfalfa seed productivity was 570–759 kg/ha.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Value
570-759 kg/hae0
Qualifier
first year of usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variable alfalfa forms seed productivity at a fairly high level: in the first year of use – 570-759 kg/ha, in subsequent years – 234–309 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent-year seed productivity was 234–309 kg/ha.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
seed productivitye0
Value
234–309 kg/hae0
Qualifier
subsequent yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variable alfalfa forms seed productivity at a fairly high level: in the first year of use – 570-759 kg/ha, in subsequent years – 234–309 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide rows with spring wheat cover yielded 360 kg/ha of seed.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
wide rows (60 cm) in variants with cover crops of spring wheate0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
360 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield was obtained when sowing in wide rows (60 cm) in variants with cover crops of spring wheat (360 kg/ha) and vetch-oat mixture for green mass (359 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide rows with vetch–oat cover yielded 359 kg/ha of seed.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
vetch-oat mixture for green masse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
359 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield was obtained when sowing in wide rows (60 cm) in variants with cover crops of spring wheat (360 kg/ha) and vetch-oat mixture for green mass (359 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brushes per shoot positively correlated with yield (r=0.47).

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
brushes on a shoote0
Outcome
yield levele0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
r=0.47e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of brushes on a shoot and the number of pods on a brush had an average positive effect on the yield level, correlation coefficients r=0.47 and r=0.53, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods per brush positively correlated with yield (r=0.53).

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
pods on a brushe0
Outcome
yield levele0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
r=0.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of brushes on a shoot and the number of pods on a brush had an average positive effect on the yield level, correlation coefficients r=0.47 and r=0.53, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvested seed germination ranged from 77–90%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
Laboratory seed germinatione0
Value
77–90 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory seed germination in the harvest was at the level of 77–90 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-row vetch–oat sowings reached 90% germination.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
wide-row sowings with row spacing of 60 and 30 cm in the variant with a vetch-oat mixturee0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relatively the highest germination (90 %) was in wide-row sowings with row spacing of 60 and 30 cm in the variant with a vetch-oat mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch–oat cover was the most energy-efficient seed-production method (coefficient 5.65).

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
vetch-oat mixture as a cover crope0
Outcome
energy efficiency coefficiente0
Value
5.65e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most energy-efficient method is to use a vetch-oat mixture as a cover crop (energy efficiency coefficient – 5.65)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1798 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coverless sowing had 556% profitability.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
coverless sowinge0
Outcome
profitability levele0
Value
556 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coverless sowing is economically advantageous (profitability level – 556 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cover crop · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.