Paper · 2025 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Fusarium head blight biocontrol using cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus velezensis RC218

Gustavo Ochoa; Augustina Reynoso; Alicia del Valle Zurita; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cyclic lipopeptides (CLPs) produced by Bacillus species have been reported to have several antimicrobial effects against plant pathogens through different mechanisms such as destabilisation of plasma membrane and loss of electrolytes. The present study focused on the production, extraction, identification of CLPs produced by B. velezensis RC218 and evaluation of their activity against the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum. Mass spectroscopy confirmed the presence of these lipopeptides, with several carbon-length variants in each family. Other antimicrobial molecules such as macrolactin, dificidin and bacilysin were also detected. In vitro experiments showed a significant reduction in the mycelial radial growth (up to 84%) of three F. graminearum sensu stricto strains isolated from a Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemic. Greenhouse experiments were carried out on BioINTA 1005 (FHB-susceptible wheat) and the tolerant variety Cronox. Application of the pure extract to flowering heads, prior to the pathogen inoculation, resulted in reduced disease incidence and severity in both cultivars. The biocontrol effect was more pronounced in the susceptible variety (78.5% reduction in incidence and 82.5% in severity) compared to the tolerant Cronox (69.3% and 66.3% reductions, respectively). Given that metabolites production by bacteria at the in planta level can be altered by the plant-environment interaction, applying the purified lipopeptide extract from B. velezensis RC218 as a preventive against FHB emerges as a promising method to control pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass spectroscopy confirmed the presence of cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus velezensis RC218, with several carbon-length variants in each family.

Taxon
Bacillus velezensis RC218Bacillus velezensist0
Outcome
presence of these lipopeptidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · TaxonMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus velezensis RC218”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mass spectroscopy confirmed the presence of these lipopeptides, with several carbon-length variants in each family”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–542 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrolactin, dificidin and bacilysin were also detected as other antimicrobial molecules from B. velezensis RC218.

Taxon
Bacillus velezensis RC218Bacillus velezensist0
Outcome
macrolactin, dificidin and bacilysine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · TaxonMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus velezensis RC218”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Other antimicrobial molecules such as macrolactin, dificidin and bacilysin were also detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, the lipopeptides significantly reduced mycelial radial growth of three F. graminearum sensu stricto strains by up to 84%.

Taxon
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0
Treatment
CLPse1
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis RC218Bacillus velezensise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial radial growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
up to 84%e0
Setting
In vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · TaxonScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro experiments showed a significant reduction in the mycelial radial growth (up to 84%) of three F. graminearum sensu stricto strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“CLPs produced by B. velezensis RC218”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, the pure extract applied before pathogen inoculation reduced Fusarium head blight incidence by 78.5% in the susceptible wheat BioINTA 1005.

Material
BioINTA 1005e0
Treatment
pure extracte1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume3pathogen
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
reductione2
Value
78.5%e2
Setting
Greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were carried out on BioINTA 1005 (FHB-susceptible wheat) and the tolerant variety Cronox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the pure extract to flowering heads, prior to the pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biocontrol effect was more pronounced in the susceptible variety (78.5% reduction in incidence and 82.5% in severity) compared to the tolerant Cronox (69.3% and 66.3% reductions, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1298 · show in text ↑
e3

“the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, the pure extract reduced Fusarium head blight severity by 82.5% in the susceptible wheat BioINTA 1005.

Material
BioINTA 1005e0
Treatment
pure extracte1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume3pathogen
Outcome
severitye2
Direction
reductione2
Value
82.5%e2
Setting
Greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were carried out on BioINTA 1005 (FHB-susceptible wheat) and the tolerant variety Cronox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the pure extract to flowering heads, prior to the pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biocontrol effect was more pronounced in the susceptible variety (78.5% reduction in incidence and 82.5% in severity) compared to the tolerant Cronox (69.3% and 66.3% reductions, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1298 · show in text ↑
e3

“the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, the pure extract reduced Fusarium head blight incidence by 69.3% in the tolerant wheat variety Cronox.

Material
Cronoxe0
Treatment
pure extracte1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume3pathogen
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
reductione2
Value
69.3%e2
Setting
Greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were carried out on BioINTA 1005 (FHB-susceptible wheat) and the tolerant variety Cronox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the pure extract to flowering heads, prior to the pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biocontrol effect was more pronounced in the susceptible variety (78.5% reduction in incidence and 82.5% in severity) compared to the tolerant Cronox (69.3% and 66.3% reductions, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1298 · show in text ↑
e3

“the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, the pure extract reduced Fusarium head blight severity by 66.3% in the tolerant wheat variety Cronox.

Material
Cronoxe0
Treatment
pure extracte1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume3pathogen
Outcome
severitye2
Direction
reductione2
Value
66.3%e2
Setting
Greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were carried out on BioINTA 1005 (FHB-susceptible wheat) and the tolerant variety Cronox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the pure extract to flowering heads, prior to the pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biocontrol effect was more pronounced in the susceptible variety (78.5% reduction in incidence and 82.5% in severity) compared to the tolerant Cronox (69.3% and 66.3% reductions, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1298 · show in text ↑
e3

“the phytopathogen Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–426 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that applying the purified lipopeptide extract from B. velezensis RC218 as a preventive against FHB is a promising method to control pathogens.

Outcome
preventive against FHBe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“applying the purified lipopeptide extract from B. velezensis RC218 as a preventive against FHB emerges as a promising method to control pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1567 · show in text ↑

botanical · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.