Paper · 2025 · Soil Systems

Moss Biochar Facilitates Root Colonization of Halotolerant Halomonas salifodinae for Promoting Plant Growth Under Saline–Alkali Stress

Wenyue Wang; Yunlong Liu; Zirun Zhao; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The utilization of the widely distributed saline–alkali lands by planting forage grasses is a hot topic. However, the promotion of plant growth remains a great challenge during the exploration of this stressful soil. While halotolerant bacteria are beneficial for plants against saline–alkali stress, their stable colonization on plant roots should be further strengthened. In this study, we investigated the effect of moss biochar on the root colonization of the exogenous halotolerant Halomonas salifodinae isolated from saline lake sediments. During the incubation with the bacteria, the biochar strongly bound the bacterium and induced biofilm formation on the biochar surface. When the biochar and the bacterium were added into the culturing soil of the forage grass Medicago sativa, the biochar remarkably assisted the root binding and biofilm formation of this bacterium on the plant roots. Under the biochar–bacterium combined treatment, the numbers of total bacteria, halotolerant bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased from 105.5 CFU/g soil to 107.2 CFU/g soil, from 104.5 CFU/g soil to 106.1 CFU/g soil, and from 104.7 CFU/g soil to 106.3 CFU/g soil, respectively. After 30 days of culturing, the biochar and the bacterium in combination increased the plant height from 10.3 cm to 36 cm, and enhanced the accumulation of chlorophyll a, reducing sugars, soluble proteins, and superoxide dismutase in the leaves. Moreover, the combined treatment increased the activity of soil enzymes, including peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease. Meanwhile, the levels of various cations in the rhizosphere soil were reduced by the combined treatment, e.g., Na+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, etc., indicating an improvement in the soil quality. This study developed the biochar–halotolerant bacterium joint strategy to improve the yield of forage grasses in saline–alkali soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moss biochar bound Halomonas salifodinae and induced biofilm formation on the biochar surface.

Interactor
the bacteriumBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
biofilm formation on the biochar surfacee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the biochar strongly bound the bacterium and induced biofilm formation on the biochar surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth Under Saline–Alkali Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar assisted Halomonas salifodinae binding and biofilm formation on Medicago sativa roots.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
the biochar and the bacteriume0
Interactor
the bacteriumBacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
root binding and biofilm formation of this bacterium on the plant rootse0
Direction
assistede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the biochar and the bacterium were added into the culturing soil of the forage grass Medicago sativa, the biochar remarkably assisted the root binding and biofilm formation of this bacterium on the plant roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biochar and bacterium increased total bacteria in soil from 105.5 to 107.2 CFU/g soil.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
biochar–bacterium combined treatmente0
Outcome
numbers of total bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
107.2 CFU/g soile0
Qualifier
105.5 CFU/g soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the biochar–bacterium combined treatment, the numbers of total bacteria, halotolerant bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased from 105.5 CFU/g soil to 107.2 CFU/g soil, from 104.5 CFU/g soil to 106.1 CFU/g soil, and from 104.7 CFU/g soil to 106.3 CFU/g soil, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased halotolerant bacteria from 104.5 to 106.1 CFU/g soil.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
biochar–bacterium combined treatmente0
Outcome
halotolerant bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
106.1 CFU/g soile0
Qualifier
104.5 CFU/g soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the biochar–bacterium combined treatment, the numbers of total bacteria, halotolerant bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased from 105.5 CFU/g soil to 107.2 CFU/g soil, from 104.5 CFU/g soil to 106.1 CFU/g soil, and from 104.7 CFU/g soil to 106.3 CFU/g soil, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased nitrogen-fixing bacteria from 104.7 to 106.3 CFU/g soil.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
biochar–bacterium combined treatmente0
Outcome
nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
106.3 CFU/g soile0
Qualifier
104.7 CFU/g soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the biochar–bacterium combined treatment, the numbers of total bacteria, halotolerant bacteria, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased from 105.5 CFU/g soil to 107.2 CFU/g soil, from 104.5 CFU/g soil to 106.1 CFU/g soil, and from 104.7 CFU/g soil to 106.3 CFU/g soil, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biochar and bacterium increased Medicago sativa height from 10.3 cm to 36 cm after 30 days.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
biochar and the bacterium in combinatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36 cme0
Qualifier
10.3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 30 days of culturing, the biochar and the bacterium in combination increased the plant height from 10.3 cm to 36 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1307 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment enhanced leaf chlorophyll a and reducing sugars.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
biochar and the bacterium in combinatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, reducing sugarse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the accumulation of chlorophyll a, reducing sugars, soluble proteins, and superoxide dismutase in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“the biochar and the bacterium in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1258 · show in text ↑
e2

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment enhanced leaf soluble proteins and superoxide dismutase.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae2
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
biochar and the bacterium in combinatione1
Outcome
soluble proteins, and superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the accumulation of chlorophyll a, reducing sugars, soluble proteins, and superoxide dismutase in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“the biochar and the bacterium in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1258 · show in text ↑
e2

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased soil peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase and urease activity.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
activity of soil enzymes, including peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, and ureasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment increased the activity of soil enzymes, including peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced cations in rhizosphere soil.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
levels of various cations in the rhizosphere soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the levels of various cations in the rhizosphere soil were reduced by the combined treatment, e.g., Na+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, etc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1705 · show in text ↑
e1

“forage grass Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–787 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.