Paper · 2025 · Environmental Microbiome

Meloidogyne incognita parasitism is affected by Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and its effects on tomato-associated microbiota

Olivera Topalović; Enoch Narh Kudjordjie; Sanea Sheikh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multitrophic interactions in plant rhizosphere and endosphere can be beneficial or deleterious for the plant health. The parasitism by root-feeding nematodes is on the negative end of the interaction spectrum, and may be very difficult to control. Biological agents are a promising alternative to the environmentally harmful nematicides; however, their efficiency in natural soil often seems to be low due to their limited establishment and dispersal. Thus, understanding how the introduced biological agents interact with nematodes and the surrounding microbiota is necessary to improve sustainable management of root-feeding nematodes. Here, we conducted two experiments to study the effects of Pseudomonas protegens strain CHA0 (CHA0) on the performance of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. In the first experiment, we compared M. incognita performance in natural and sterilized soil in the presence and absence of CHA0. In the second experiment, we studied the composition of microbes in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato plants grown in native soil in response to M. incognita and CHA0. RESULTS: We found that nematode performance, especially nematode reproduction, was significantly increased in native soil amended with CHA0. In addition, we found the highest relative abundance of Pseudomonas in tomato endosphere in response to nematode co-inoculations with CHA0, which suggests that root wounding, caused by nematodes, increased the entrance of inoculated and/or native Pseudomonas spp. As many Pseudomonas spp. are plant growth promoting, this may explain that plant growth was highest in this treatment. Furthermore, the rhizosphere of nematode-inoculated plants was enriched with Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga and Variovorax, which are genera generally associated with nematode-suppressive soils. On the other hand, other known nematode-suppressive genera such as Bacillus, Lysobacter, Devosia and Rhizobium were depleted in plants where nematodes were co-inoculated with CHA0, which may explain the higher nematode performance when plants were co-inoculated with CHA0. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the effect of P. protegens strain CHA0 on M. incognita parasitism is influenced by the multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato plants. We must understand these interactions thoroughly to optimize sustainable means to mitigate the root-knot nematodes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CHA0 significantly increased Meloidogyne incognita reproduction in native soil (negative for the plant).

Treatment
CHA0e1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Second interactor
CHA0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reproductione1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
native soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-associated microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found that nematode performance, especially nematode reproduction, was significantly increased in native soil amended with CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1266 · show in text ↑
e2

“root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest relative abundance of Pseudomonas was found in the tomato endosphere with nematode and CHA0 co-inoculation.

Organ / stage
endospheree3
Interactor
nematodeNematodae3pest
Second interactor
CHA0e3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
relative abundance of Pseudomonase3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“we found the highest relative abundance of Pseudomonas in tomato endosphere in response to nematode co-inoculations with CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth was highest in the nematode plus CHA0 co-inoculation treatment.

Treatment
nematode co-inoculations with CHA0e5
Outcome
plant growthe4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-associated microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“plant growth was highest in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1649 · show in text ↑
e5

“in response to nematode co-inoculations with CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizosphere of nematode-inoculated plants was enriched with Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga and Variovorax.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree6
Interactor
nematodeNematodae6pest
Outcome
Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga and Variovoraxe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-associated microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“the rhizosphere of nematode-inoculated plants was enriched with Flavobacterium, Hydrogenophaga and Variovorax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus, Lysobacter and Devosia, nematode-suppressive genera, were depleted in plants co-inoculated with nematodes and CHA0.

Treatment
co-inoculated with CHA0e7
Interactor
nematodesNematodae7pest
Outcome
Bacillus, Lysobacter, Devosiae7
Direction
depletede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-associated microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“other known nematode-suppressive genera such as Bacillus, Lysobacter, Devosia and Rhizobium were depleted in plants where nematodes were co-inoculated with CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–2025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium, a nematode-suppressive genus, was depleted in plants co-inoculated with nematodes and CHA0.

Treatment
co-inoculated with CHA0e7
Interactor
nematodesNematodae7pest
Outcome
Rhizobiume7
Direction
depletede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-associated microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“other known nematode-suppressive genera such as Bacillus, Lysobacter, Devosia and Rhizobium were depleted in plants where nematodes were co-inoculated with CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–2025 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of CHA0 on M. incognita parasitism is influenced by multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato.

Outcome
M. incognita parasitisme7
Qualifier
multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere and endospheree7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the effect of P. protegens strain CHA0 on M. incognita parasitism is influenced by the multitrophic interactions in the rhizosphere and endosphere of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2318 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.