Paper · 2025 · Weed Technology

Effect of herbicide application timing and sequence on waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control, Enlist E3® soybean yield, and economic returns

Navjot Singh; Ryan P. Miller; Thomas J. Peters; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Enlist E3® soybean is resistant to 2,4-D, glyphosate, and glufosinate, allowing postemergence applications of these herbicides sequentially or as tank mixes. The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effect of postemergence herbicide application timing and sequence with or without a preemergence application of micro-encapsulated acetochlor on waterhemp and common lambsquarters control, soybean yield, and economic returns. Field experiments were conducted in Rosemount and Franklin, Minnesota, in 2021 and 2022. Site, herbicide application timing, and sequence influenced weed control, yield, and profitability. In Rosemount, preemergence followed by (fb) two-pass postemergence programs, including 2,4-D + glyphosate applied at mid-postemergence with or without S -metolachlor, resulted in ≥95% waterhemp control at 28 d after late postemergence application. In Franklin, where weed density was lower, two-pass postemergence programs, regardless of preemergence application that included at least one application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (with or without S -metolachlor), provided ≥97% control of waterhemp and common lambsquarters at 28 d after late postemergence. The level of control was comparable to that of a preemergence herbicide fb a mid-postemergence application of 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor at that site. In Rosemount, including acetochlor as the preemergence herbicide in the preemergence fb postemergence programs improved soybean yield by 32% and partial returns by US$384.50 ha −1 compared to postemergence herbicides–only programs. In contrast, the preemergence application did not affect yield or profitability in Franklin. The highest soybean yield (2,925.7 kg ha −1 ) in Rosemount resulted after glufosinate was applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate applied mid-postemergence. This yield was comparable to that of glufosinate applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor applied mid-postemergence and the two-pass glufosinate (early postemergence fb mid-postemergence) program, highlighting the importance of early season weed control. In Franklin, 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor (applied mid-postemergence) fb glufosinate (applied late postemergence) provided a yield that was similar to the aforementioned programs at that site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site, timing and sequence influenced weed control, yield and profitability.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
herbicide application timing, and sequencee0
Outcome
weed control, yield, and profitabilitye0
Setting
Sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Site, herbicide application timing, and sequence influenced weed control, yield, and profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Rosemount, preemergence followed by two postemergence passes achieved at least 95% waterhemp control.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
preemergence followed by (fb) two-pass postemergence programse0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
waterhemp controle0
Value
≥95%e0
Setting
Rosemounte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In Rosemount, preemergence followed by (fb) two-pass postemergence programs, including 2,4-D + glyphosate applied at mid-postemergence with or without S -metolachlor, resulted in ≥95% waterhemp control at 28 d after late postemergence application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Franklin, two-pass programs including 2,4-D plus glyphosate achieved at least 97% waterhemp control.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
two-pass postemergence programse0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
control of waterhempe0
Value
≥97%e0
Setting
Frankline0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In Franklin, where weed density was lower, two-pass postemergence programs, regardless of preemergence application that included at least one application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (with or without S -metolachlor), provided ≥97% control of waterhemp and common lambsquarters at 28 d after late postemergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same Franklin programs achieved at least 97% common lambsquarters control.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
two-pass postemergence programse0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
controle0
Value
≥97%e0
Setting
Frankline0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Franklin, where weed density was lower, two-pass postemergence programs, regardless of preemergence application that included at least one application of 2,4-D + glyphosate (with or without S -metolachlor), provided ≥97% control of waterhemp and common lambsquarters at 28 d after late postemergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Franklin two-pass control matched a preemergence plus mid-postemergence reference program.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
preemergence herbicide fb a mid-postemergence application of 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlore0
Outcome
level of controle0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The level of control was comparable to that of a preemergence herbicide fb a mid-postemergence application of 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor at that site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Rosemount, preemergence acetochlor improved soybean yield by 32% versus postemergence-only programs.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
acetochlor as the preemergence herbicidee0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
postemergence herbicides–only programse0
Setting
Rosemounte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Rosemount, including acetochlor as the preemergence herbicide in the preemergence fb postemergence programs improved soybean yield by 32% and partial returns by US$384.50 ha −1 compared to postemergence herbicides–only programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Rosemount, preemergence acetochlor improved partial returns by US$384.50 ha −1.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
acetochlor as the preemergence herbicidee0
Outcome
partial returnse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
US$384.50 ha −1e0
Comparator
postemergence herbicides–only programse0
Setting
Rosemounte0

Verbatim

e0

“In Rosemount, including acetochlor as the preemergence herbicide in the preemergence fb postemergence programs improved soybean yield by 32% and partial returns by US$384.50 ha −1 compared to postemergence herbicides–only programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Franklin, preemergence application did not affect yield.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
preemergence applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
Frankline0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the preemergence application did not affect yield or profitability in Franklin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Franklin, preemergence application did not affect profitability.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
preemergence applicatione0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
Frankline0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the preemergence application did not affect yield or profitability in Franklin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early glufosinate followed by mid-postemergence 2,4-D plus glyphosate gave Rosemount’s highest soybean yield, 2,925.7 kg ha −1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
glufosinate was applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate applied mid-postemergencee0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2,925.7 kg ha −1e0
Setting
Rosemounte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest soybean yield (2,925.7 kg ha −1 ) in Rosemount resulted after glufosinate was applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate applied mid-postemergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest-yield program matched one with added S-metolachlor.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
glufosinate applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor applied mid-postemergencee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This yield was comparable to that of glufosinate applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor applied mid-postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest-yield program matched a two-pass glufosinate program.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
two-pass glufosinate (early postemergence fb mid-postemergence) programe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This yield was comparable to that of glufosinate applied early postemergence fb 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor applied mid-postemergence and the two-pass glufosinate (early postemergence fb mid-postemergence) program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–2062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Franklin, mid-postemergence 2,4-D plus glyphosate plus S-metolachlor followed by late glufosinate yielded similarly to the referenced programs.

Taxon
Enlist E3® soybeant0
Treatment
2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor (applied mid-postemergence) fb glufosinate (applied late postemergence)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
aforementioned programse0
Setting
Frankline0

Verbatim

e0

“In Franklin, 2,4-D + glyphosate + S -metolachlor (applied mid-postemergence) fb glufosinate (applied late postemergence) provided a yield that was similar to the aforementioned programs at that site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2122–2321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enlist E3® soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–163 · show in text ↑

glufosinate · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

31 papers: 8 positive, 23 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

123 papers: 55 positive, 68 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

acetochlor · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

321 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

456 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.