Paper · 2025 · Journal of Applied Horticulture

Salicylic acid-mediated defense response against root-knot nematode in tuberose

K.B.M. Singh; J. Madhavan; P.K. Mandal

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) poses a considerable threat to tuberose cultivation. Biological compounds, such as salicylic acid (SA), act as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) elicitors and may contribute to the resistance of host plants against nematodes. The study investigated the effects of SA at varying concentrations on inducing resistance in tuberose against M. incognita via tuber soaking, foliar spray, or a combined method. Plant growth parameters indicated that pretreatment of the SA exhibited no significant negative effect on the shoot length, shoot weight, number of leaves, tuber weight and root weight. The root image analysis revealed a positive effect of 10 mM SA on root length, number of root tips, forks, and crossings compared to the inoculated control plants. Leaf spray with SA is the most effective treatment, as it markedly reduces both root galling (54.8-71.6%) and infestation (66.8–72.6%). Using the simple, quick, and cost-effective SA spray approach, a 64 to 76% reduction in the multiplication factor (MF) of nematode infestation was observed. This is the first evidence of the use of SA in tuberose to induce resistance against M. incognita.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA pretreatment had no significant negative effect on shoot and root growth traits.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
pretreatment of the SAe0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot weight, number of leavese0
Direction
no significant negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretreatment of the SA exhibited no significant negative effect on the shoot length, shoot weight, number of leaves, tuber weight and root weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA pretreatment had no significant negative effect on tuber and root weight.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
pretreatment of the SAe0
Outcome
tuber weight and root weighte0
Direction
no significant negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretreatment of the SA exhibited no significant negative effect on the shoot length, shoot weight, number of leaves, tuber weight and root weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mM SA improved root architecture relative to inoculated controls.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
10 mM SAe0
Outcome
root length, number of root tips, forkse0
Direction
positive effecte0
Comparator
inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive effect of 10 mM SA on root length, number of root tips, forks, and crossings compared to the inoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten mM SA improved root crossings relative to inoculated controls.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
10 mM SAe0
Outcome
crossingse0
Direction
positive effecte0
Comparator
inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive effect of 10 mM SA on root length, number of root tips, forks, and crossings compared to the inoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA leaf spray reduced root galling by 54.8-71.6%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
Leaf spray with SAe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducese0
Value
54.8-71.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spray with SA is the most effective treatment, as it markedly reduces both root galling (54.8-71.6%) and infestation (66.8–72.6%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA leaf spray reduced infestation by 66.8–72.6%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
Leaf spray with SAe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
reducese0
Value
66.8–72.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spray with SA is the most effective treatment, as it markedly reduces both root galling (54.8-71.6%) and infestation (66.8–72.6%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA spray reduced nematode multiplication factor by 64 to 76%.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
SA spraye0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
multiplication factor (MF) of nematode infestatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
64 to 76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA spray approach, a 64 to 76% reduction in the multiplication factor (MF) of nematode infestation was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Meloidogyne incognita · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.