Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Synergistic activation of grapevine defense mechanisms against downy mildew by Ascophyllum nodosum extract and Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0

Ramin Bahmani; Pramod Rathor; Prashant More; et al.

11
claims
36
verbatim quotes
8
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola , poses a major threat to grapevine production, necessitating effective and sustainable disease management strategies. Ascophyllum nodosum extract (ANE) and Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 possess biostimulant and biocontrol properties, respectively, with reported potential to induce plant defense against various pathogens. However, their combined application and potential synergistic effects in grapevine disease management remain largely unexplored. In this study, their efficacy in controlling downy mildew in grapevines was investigated. Our results demonstrate that both ANE and CHA0, individually and in combination, significantly reduced downy mildew severity. In vitro assays revealed that grape leaves treated with ANE, CHA0, or their combination suppressed disease establishment and progression, with the combined treatment showing the greatest reduction in spore count (~66%), zoospore numbers (~89–93%), and empty sporangia (~53–69%). In vivo greenhouse experiments confirmed these findings, showing that combined foliar applications of ANE and CHA0 reduced downy mildew incidence to approximately 22%, compared to 40–50% with individual treatments and 70% in untreated controls, implying a synergistic interaction between these treatments. In addition to disease suppression, combined ANE and CHA0 applications triggered robust biochemical and molecular defense responses in grapevines. Key defense enzymes, including phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase, showed significantly enhanced activities, accompanied by elevated levels of phenolics and hydrogen peroxide. At the molecular level, the combination significantly upregulated stress-responsive genes such as CHI , GLP2 and GLP7 , along with jasmonic acid-responsive genes including LOX9 , OSM1 , and PR4 , suggesting a priming effect that reinforces the plant’s innate immune responses. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of combined ANE and CHA0 treatments in enhancing grapevine resistance to downy mildew through the activation of defense mechanisms and modulation of key biochemical markers. The synergistic interplay between the biostimulant and biocontrol agent offers a promising eco-friendly alternative to conventional chemical-based disease management in viticulture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ANE alone significantly reduced downy mildew severity.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
ANEe0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
downy mildew severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ANE and CHA0, individually and in combination, significantly reduced downy mildew severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CHA0 alone significantly reduced downy mildew severity.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
CHA0e0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0Pseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
downy mildew severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ANE and CHA0, individually and in combination, significantly reduced downy mildew severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ANE and CHA0 significantly reduced downy mildew severity.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
ANE and CHA0e0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0Pseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
downy mildew severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ANE and CHA0, individually and in combination, significantly reduced downy mildew severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced spore count by about 66%.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
spore counte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
~66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment showing the greatest reduction in spore count (~66%), zoospore numbers (~89–93%), and empty sporangia (~53–69%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced zoospore numbers by about 89–93%.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
zoospore numberse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
~89–93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment showing the greatest reduction in spore count (~66%), zoospore numbers (~89–93%), and empty sporangia (~53–69%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced empty sporangia by about 53–69%.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
empty sporangiae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
~53–69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined treatment showing the greatest reduction in spore count (~66%), zoospore numbers (~89–93%), and empty sporangia (~53–69%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar applications reduced incidence to approximately 22%, versus 40–50% with individual treatments and 70% untreated.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
combined foliar applications of ANE and CHA0e0
Interactor
Plasmopara viticolaPlasmopara viticolae2pathogen
Outcome
downy mildew incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
40–50% with individual treatments and 70% in untreated controlse0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmopara viticola
Plasmopara viticola · InteractorRude · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined foliar applications of ANE and CHA0 reduced downy mildew incidence to approximately 22%, compared to 40–50% with individual treatments and 70% in untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“Downy mildew, caused by Plasmopara viticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined applications enhanced phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise2
Treatment
combined ANE and CHA0 applicationse1
Outcome
phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Key defense enzymes, including phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase, showed significantly enhanced activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined ANE and CHA0 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1367 · show in text ↑
e2

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined applications elevated phenolics and hydrogen peroxide.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise2
Treatment
combined ANE and CHA0 applicationse1
Outcome
levels of phenolics and hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accompanied by elevated levels of phenolics and hydrogen peroxide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined ANE and CHA0 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1367 · show in text ↑
e2

“downy mildew in grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment upregulated CHI, GLP2 and GLP7.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
the combinatione0
Gene
CHI , GLP2 and GLP7e0
Outcome
stress-responsive genese0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination significantly upregulated stress-responsive genes such as CHI , GLP2 and GLP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1766 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment upregulated LOX9, OSM1, and PR4.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
the combinatione1
Gene
LOX9 , OSM1 , and PR4e0
Outcome
jasmonic acid-responsive genese0
Direction
upregulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“jasmonic acid-responsive genes including LOX9 , OSM1 , and PR4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination significantly upregulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1714 · show in text ↑

Ascophyllum nodosum · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · Plasmopara viticola · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Plasmopara viticola · VitisResults agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.