Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Genotypic Variability in Root System Architecture and Its Association With Fe and Zn Biofortification in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Hafsa; Aysha Kiran; Abdul Wakeel; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Wheat has an inherently low concentration of Fe and Zn; therefore, enhancing their concentrations in grains has become vital to mitigate micronutrient malnutrition in many developing countries through biofortification strategies. Aims This study aims to explore variability in root architectural traits and their roles in Fe and Zn uptake leading to its accumulation in grains. Methods A rhizobox‐based experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of Fe‐ and Zn‐deficient and ‐sufficient conditions on wheat root system architecture (RSA). Four treatments of Fe and Zn fertilizer combinations with four replications were used in these experiments (without Fe and Zn, with Zn and without Fe, without Zn and with Fe, and with Fe and Zn). Further, in a pot experiment, physiological attributes, growth, yield, and uptake of Fe and Zn were determined in the selected eight wheat varieties based on rhizobox trial results. Results Significant genotypic variability was noted in RSA traits of wheat genotypes, and some interesting correlations have been identified. Zinc‐efficient varieties Zincol‐16 and Akbar‐19 revealed better RSA traits like enhanced root diameter, lateral root density, and root length as compared to inefficient varieties like Ujala‐16 and TD‐1. The Zincol‐16 articulated maximum improvement in grain Fe and Zn content, that is, 53.9 mg Fe kg −1 concentration in the treatment with soil Fe application and 33.18 mg Zn kg −1 found in treatment with soil application of Zn. Yield attributes were significantly improved by the combined application of Fe and Zn, as the pot experiment showed that maximum thousand‐grain weight (47.3 g) and grain yield (12.4 g per pot) were found in Akbar‐19. Conclusion This study suggests that genetic variability in RSA correlates with increased Fe and Zn concentrations in grains. Therefore, by using RSA attributes for Fe and Zn biofortification in wheat, these findings may be used in breeding programs to develop new biofortified varieties to mitigate micronutrient malnutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zincol‐16 and Akbar‐19 had better root system architecture traits, with enhanced root diameter, lateral root density and root length, than Ujala‐16 and TD‐1.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zincol‐16 and Akbar‐19e1
Outcome
root diameter, lateral root density, and root lengthe1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
Ujala‐16 and TD‐1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zincol‐16 and Akbar‐19 revealed better RSA traits like enhanced root diameter, lateral root density, and root length as compared to inefficient varieties like Ujala‐16 and TD‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant genotypic variability was found in root system architecture traits among wheat genotypes.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
wheat genotypese2
Outcome
RSA traitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant genotypic variability was noted in RSA traits of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zincol‐16 showed the maximum improvement in grain Fe content, 53.9 mg Fe kg −1, with soil Fe application.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zincol‐16e3
Treatment
soil Fe applicatione3
Outcome
grain Fe and Zn contente3
Direction
maximum improvemente3
Value
53.9 mg Fe kg −1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Zincol‐16 articulated maximum improvement in grain Fe and Zn content, that is, 53.9 mg Fe kg −1 concentration in the treatment with soil Fe application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zincol‐16 showed the maximum improvement in grain Zn content, 33.18 mg Zn kg −1, with soil application of Zn.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zincol‐16e3
Treatment
soil application of Zne4
Outcome
grain Fe and Zn contente3
Direction
maximum improvemente3
Value
33.18 mg Zn kg −1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Zincol‐16 articulated maximum improvement in grain Fe and Zn content, that is, 53.9 mg Fe kg −1 concentration in the treatment with soil Fe application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1441 · show in text ↑
e4

“33.18 mg Zn kg −1 found in treatment with soil application of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Akbar‐19 had the maximum thousand‐grain weight of 47.3 g.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Akbar‐19e6
Outcome
thousand‐grain weighte6
Value
47.3 ge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“maximum thousand‐grain weight (47.3 g) and grain yield (12.4 g per pot) were found in Akbar‐19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Akbar‐19 had the maximum grain yield of 12.4 g per pot.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Akbar‐19e6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Value
12.4 g per pote6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“maximum thousand‐grain weight (47.3 g) and grain yield (12.4 g per pot) were found in Akbar‐19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of Fe and Zn significantly improved yield attributes of wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined application of Fe and Zne5
Outcome
Yield attributese5
Direction
significantly improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yield attributes were significantly improved by the combined application of Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1597 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variability in root system architecture correlates with increased Fe and Zn concentrations in wheat grains.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
grainse7
Outcome
Fe and Zn concentrations in grainse7
Direction
increasede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e7

“genetic variability in RSA correlates with increased Fe and Zn concentrations in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1852 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.