Paper · 2025 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The impact of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi on the abundance and species diversity of predatory arthropods on maize canopy

Siti Herlinda; Elfin Meidi; Erise Anggraini; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Maize ecosystem has a high arthropod species diversity, the use of insecticides or bioinsecticides may impact the arthropod species diversity and abundance. To accomplish this, it is necessary to monitor how endophytic entomopathogenic fungi affect the abundance and the species diversity of predatory arthropods in the maize canopy. Beauveria bassiana (JgSPK isolate) (GenBank: MZ356494) was applied using a suspension of 1 × 1010 conidia ml −1 through seed treatment, foliar spray, and root soaking, with an untreated control group for comparison. The results demonstrated that the fungus did not significantly affect the species diversity or abundance of predatory arthropods. A total of 24 predatory arthropod species were identified, with the most dominant species being Rhyothemis phyllis. The order Odonata had the highest abundance of predatory arthropods in the maize canopy, comprising 80% of the population in the control treatment, 70% in the root treatment, 69% in the seed treatment, and 81% in the leaf treatment. Another dominant order was Coleoptera, accounting for 41% in the control, 44% in the root treatment, and 48% in the leaf treatment. In conclusion, the study found that endophytic entomopathogenic fungi had no adverse effects on predatory arthropods in the maize canopy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana application did not significantly affect predatory arthropod species diversity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Beauveria bassiana (JgSPK isolate)e0
Interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0symbiont
Outcome
species diversitye1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1
Comparator
untreated control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beauveria bassiana (JgSPK isolate) (GenBank: MZ356494) was applied using a suspension of 1 × 1010 conidia ml −1 through seed treatment, foliar spray, and root soaking, with an untreated control group for comparison.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fungus did not significantly affect the species diversity or abundance of predatory arthropods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana application did not significantly affect predatory arthropod abundance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Beauveria bassiana (JgSPK isolate)e0
Interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0symbiont
Outcome
abundance of predatory arthropodse1
Direction
did not significantly affecte1
Comparator
untreated control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beauveria bassiana (JgSPK isolate) (GenBank: MZ356494) was applied using a suspension of 1 × 1010 conidia ml −1 through seed treatment, foliar spray, and root soaking, with an untreated control group for comparison.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fungus did not significantly affect the species diversity or abundance of predatory arthropods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-four predatory arthropod species were identified.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
predatory arthropod speciese0
Value
24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 24 predatory arthropod species were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhyothemis phyllis was the most dominant predatory arthropod species.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Rhyothemis phyllisRhyothemis phyllise0other
Outcome
most dominant speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhyothemis phyllis
Rhyothemis phyllis · InteractorLen Worthington · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most dominant species being Rhyothemis phyllis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Odonata had the highest abundance in maize canopy, with treatment percentages reported.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
OdonataOdonatae0other
Outcome
highest abundance of predatory arthropodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The order Odonata had the highest abundance of predatory arthropods in the maize canopy, comprising 80% of the population in the control treatment, 70% in the root treatment, 69% in the seed treatment, and 81% in the leaf treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1037 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coleoptera was another dominant order with reported percentages across treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
ColeopteraColeopterae0other
Outcome
Another dominant ordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another dominant order was Coleoptera, accounting for 41% in the control, 44% in the root treatment, and 48% in the leaf treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.