Paper · 2025 · Plants

The Effect of Post-Emergence Application of Biostimulants and Soil Amendments in Maize Cultivation on the Growth and Yield of Plants

Łukasz Sobiech; Monika Grzanka; Robert Idziak; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maize is considered to be one of the most significant crops in the world. On a global scale, the appropriate yield level of food can largely affect food security. During cultivation, this plant is exposed to many adverse environmental factors, including water deficiency. Plant stress is reduced by applying appropriate biostimulants or soil amendments. This study tested the effectiveness of preparations based on Rhizophagus irregularis, humic acids, Bacillus velezensis + Bacillus licheniformis and Methylobacterium symbioticum. The aim of the project was to assess the effect of selected microorganisms and substances on the growth, yield, and physiological parameters of maize. The hypothesis assumed that the preparations selected for this study could improve the condition of the plants in various soil moisture conditions. All treatments were carried out post-emergence. The experiments were conducted in greenhouse conditions, where, in conditions of different level of soil moisture, optimal and water deficiency, the effect of the above-mentioned substances and microorganisms on the height, mass of plants, and plant chlorophyll fluorescence was determined. Chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and flavonol content were also measured. In two-year field studies, the effect of the same preparations on plant height, grain yield, thousand-grain weight, oil, protein, and starch content in the grain was determined. It was shown that appropriately selected biostimulants have a positive effect on plant growth, physiological parameters, and the yield of maize grain. The impact of preparations on the grain yield depended on the conditions that prevailed in the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriately selected biostimulants had a positive effect on maize plant growth, physiological parameters and grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
appropriately selected biostimulantse0
Outcome
plant growth, physiological parameters, and the yield of maize graine0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“appropriately selected biostimulants have a positive effect on plant growth, physiological parameters, and the yield of maize grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1564 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of the preparations on maize grain yield depended on the growing-season conditions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
preparationse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Qualifier
depended on the conditions that prevailed in the growing seasone1
Setting
growing seasone1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The impact of preparations on the grain yield depended on the conditions that prevailed in the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1675 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.