Paper · 2025 · Microorganisms

Microbiome Migration from Soil to Leaves in Maize and Rice

Jiejia Ma; Qianze Peng; Silu Chen; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The interactions between plants and microbes are essential for enhancing crop productivity. However, the mechanisms underlying host-specific microbiome migration and functional assembly remain poorly understood. In this study, microbiome migration from soil to leaves in rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays) was analyzed through 16S rRNA sequencing and phenotypic assessments. When we used the same soil microbiome source to grow rice and maize, microbiota and functional traits were specifically enriched by maize in its phyllosphere and rhizosphere. This indicated that plants can selectively assemble microbiomes from a shared microbiota source. Therefore, 22 strains were isolated from the phyllospheres of rice and maize and used to construct a synthetic microbial community (SynCom). When the soil for rice and maize growth was inoculated with the SynCom, strains belonging to Bacillus were enriched in the maize phyllosphere compared to the rice phyllosphere. Additionally, a strain belonging to Rhizobium was enriched in the maize rhizosphere compared to the rice rhizosphere. These results suggest that plant species influence the migration of microbiota within their respective compartments. Compared with mock inoculation, SynCom inoculation significantly enhanced plant growth. When we compared the microbiomes, strains belonging to Achromobacter, which were assembled by both rice and maize, played a role in enhancing plant growth. Our findings underscore the importance of microbial migration dynamics and functional assembly in leveraging plant–microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize specifically enriched microbiota and functional traits in its phyllosphere and rhizosphere from shared soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
phyllosphere and rhizospheree0
Interactor
microbiotae0symbiont
Outcome
microbiota and functional traitse0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When we used the same soil microbiome source to grow rice and maize, microbiota and functional traits were specifically enriched by maize in its phyllosphere and rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus strains were enriched in the maize phyllosphere relative to rice after SynCom soil inoculation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
phyllospheree0
Treatment
inoculated with the SynCome0
Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
strains belonging to Bacilluse0
Direction
enrichede0
Comparator
rice phyllospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the soil for rice and maize growth was inoculated with the SynCom, strains belonging to Bacillus were enriched in the maize phyllosphere compared to the rice phyllosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium was enriched in maize rhizosphere relative to rice rhizosphere.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
strain belonging to Rhizobiume0
Direction
enrichede0
Comparator
rice rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, a strain belonging to Rhizobium was enriched in the maize rhizosphere compared to the rice rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SynCom inoculation significantly enhanced plant growth versus mock inoculation.

Treatment
SynCom inoculatione0
Interactor
SynCome0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
mock inoculatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with mock inoculation, SynCom inoculation significantly enhanced plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1293 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Achromobacter strains assembled by both rice and maize contributed to growth enhancement.

Taxon
rice and maizeOryza sativaZea mayse0
Interactor
AchromobacterAchromobactere0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Achromobacter
Achromobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC/ Dr. Rodney M. Donlan/ Janice Haney Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains belonging to Achromobacter, which were assembled by both rice and maize, played a role in enhancing plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1449 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.