Paper · 2025 · Open Chemistry

Effect of biochar and soil amendment on bacterial community composition in the root soil and fruit of tomato under greenhouse conditions

Jian Zhang; Rui Xia; Pengcheng Wang

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Tomato root soil quality and microbial community composition are important for improving fruit quality. However, the effect of biochar and soil amendment on tomato fruit quality and root soil characteristics under greenhouse production has been insufficiently explored. In this study, the fruit quality and bacterial communities in tomato root soil and fruit subjected to biochar and soil amendment were analyzed using Illumina sequencing. The results showed that the application of biochar and soil amendment increased the available phosphorous in tomato greenhouse soils, ranging from 49.37 to 52.02 mg kg −1 . Biochar greatly affected the fruit quality, such as the lutein content (1.55 μg g −1 ). The potassium content in the fruits was higher than that of nitrogen and phosphorous, reaching 1.59 g kg −1 . The addition of biochar and soil amendment promoted the abundance of Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutes at the phylum level in the tomato fruits. However, biochar and soil amendment slightly reduced the number of Proteobacteria in the fruits. This study provides new insights into practical strategies for promoting tomato fruit quality and soil condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and soil amendment increased available phosphorus in tomato greenhouse soils to 49.37 to 52.02 mg kg −1.

Treatment
biochar and soil amendmente0
Outcome
available phosphorous in tomato greenhouse soilse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.37 to 52.02 mg kg −1e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of biochar and soil amendment increased the available phosphorous in tomato greenhouse soils, ranging from 49.37 to 52.02 mg kg −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar affected tomato fruit lutein content, reported at 1.55 μg g −1.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
lutein contente0
Value
1.55 μg g −1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar greatly affected the fruit quality, such as the lutein content (1.55 μg g −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content in tomato fruit exceeded nitrogen and phosphorus content, reaching 1.59 g kg −1.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
potassium content in the fruitse0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.59 g kg −1e0
Comparator
nitrogen and phosphorouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The potassium content in the fruits was higher than that of nitrogen and phosphorous, reaching 1.59 g kg −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and soil amendment promoted Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutes abundance in tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
biochar and soil amendmente0
Outcome
abundance of Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutese0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of biochar and soil amendment promoted the abundance of Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutes at the phylum level in the tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and soil amendment slightly reduced Proteobacteria in tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
biochar and soil amendmente0
Outcome
number of Proteobacteria in the fruitse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar and soil amendment slightly reduced the number of Proteobacteria in the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑

other · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.