Paper · 2024 · Jurnal Agro Industri Perkebunan

Pemberian Beberapa Jenis Pupuk Kotoran Hewan pada Pertumbuhan Single Bud Chip Tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.)

Alexsandro Fransisko Rumbekwan; Veronica Leonora Tuhumena; Stanis Laus Turot; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Sugarcane plants in West Papua province, especially Manokwari Regency, have not been cultivated by the community. This can be seen from the presence of sugar cane plants in the yard that have not been cultivated. The aim of this research is to determine the type of animal manure fertilizer that has the best effect on the growth of single-bud chip sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.). The research used an experimental method and was designed with a completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of 3 treatments, namely M0 (soil), M1 (poultry manure fertilizer; 5:1), and M2 (goat manure fertilizer; 5:1) with a total of four replications. The research shows that poultry manure provides the best results for the growth of sugar cane plants. Treatment with poultry manure showed better plant height, number of leaves, and root length than other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure produced better sugarcane plant height than other treatments.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with poultry manure showed better plant height, number of leaves, and root length than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure produced more sugarcane leaves than other treatments.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with poultry manure showed better plant height, number of leaves, and root length than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure produced longer sugarcane roots than other treatments.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with poultry manure showed better plant height, number of leaves, and root length than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tebu (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–109 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.