Paper · 2025 · Agronomy Journal

Optimizing nitrogen rates for rainfed cotton on sandy loam soils of Florida

Eajaz Ahmad Dar; Peter Omara; Joseph E. Iboyi; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen (N) fertilizer recommendations for rainfed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Florida have remained static at 67 kg N ha −1 since 1981. A study conducted at the West Florida Research and Education Center in Jay, FL, in 2022 and 2023, evaluated the response of cotton (cv. DP‐2038) to six N rates (0, 50, 101, 151, 202, and 252 kg ha −1 ), using a randomized complete block design with four replications. Total rainfall during growing season was 923 mm in 2022 and 710 mm in 2023. Results show petiole nitrate N concentration of 5050–9700 mg kg −1 at bloom and 363–1138 mg kg −1 at 4 weeks after bloom is sufficient for rainfed cotton in Florida. Aboveground biomass achieved with 252 kg N ha −1 was 25%–92% higher than with other N rates. The greatest seed cotton (3761 kg ha −1 ) and lint yield (1817 kg ha −1 ) were recorded with 151 kg N ha −1 , but this was statistically similar ( p > 0.05) to 252, 202, and 101 kg N ha −1 . Lint turnout decreased with increasing N rate, with maximum in the unfertilized control and minimum with 252 kg N ha −1 . Fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE) and internal NUE decreased by 76% and 53%, respectively, with an increase in N rate from 50 to 252 kg ha −1 . The best fit linear plateau model indicated an agronomic optimum rate of 127 kg N ha −1 . These results show the need to revise N recommendations for rainfed cotton in Florida to maximize yield and economic returns while promoting sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole nitrate concentrations of 5050–9700 mg kg −1 at bloom were sufficient.

Organ / stage
at bloome0
Outcome
petiole nitrate N concentratione0
Value
5050–9700 mg kg −1e0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“petiole nitrate N concentration of 5050–9700 mg kg −1 at bloom and 363–1138 mg kg −1 at 4 weeks after bloom is sufficient for rainfed cotton in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole nitrate concentrations of 363–1138 mg kg −1 four weeks after bloom were sufficient.

Organ / stage
4 weeks after bloome0
Outcome
petiole nitrate N concentratione0
Value
363–1138 mg kg −1e0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“petiole nitrate N concentration of 5050–9700 mg kg −1 at bloom and 363–1138 mg kg −1 at 4 weeks after bloom is sufficient for rainfed cotton in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass at 252 kg N ha −1 was 25%–92% higher than at other rates.

Treatment
252 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
Aboveground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%–92%e0
Comparator
other N ratese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Aboveground biomass achieved with 252 kg N ha −1 was 25%–92% higher than with other N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest seed cotton yield was 3761 kg ha −1 at 151 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
151 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
seed cottone0
Direction
greateste0
Value
3761 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest seed cotton (3761 kg ha −1 ) and lint yield (1817 kg ha −1 ) were recorded with 151 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest lint yield was 1817 kg ha −1 at 151 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
151 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1817 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest seed cotton (3761 kg ha −1 ) and lint yield (1817 kg ha −1 ) were recorded with 151 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield at 151 kg N ha −1 was statistically similar to rates of 101, 202 and 252 kg N ha −1.

Outcome
statistically similare0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
252, 202, and 101 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“this was statistically similar ( p > 0.05) to 252, 202, and 101 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–945 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint turnout declined as nitrogen rate increased.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Lint turnoute0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Lint turnout decreased with increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–993 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint turnout was greatest in the unfertilized control.

Treatment
unfertilized controle0
Outcome
maximume0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“with maximum in the unfertilized control and minimum with 252 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint turnout was lowest at 252 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
252 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
minimume0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“minimum with 252 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency decreased 76% from 50 to 252 kg ha −1.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
76%e0
Qualifier
from 50 to 252 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE) and internal NUE decreased by 76% and 53%, respectively, with an increase in N rate from 50 to 252 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internal nitrogen use efficiency decreased 53% from 50 to 252 kg ha −1.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
internal NUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
53%e0
Qualifier
from 50 to 252 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE) and internal NUE decreased by 76% and 53%, respectively, with an increase in N rate from 50 to 252 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1211 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A linear plateau model indicated an agronomic optimum rate of 127 kg N ha −1.

Outcome
agronomic optimum ratee0
Value
127 kg N ha −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The best fit linear plateau model indicated an agronomic optimum rate of 127 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1301 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend revising nitrogen recommendations for rainfed cotton in Florida.

Outcome
revise N recommendationse0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results show the need to revise N recommendations for rainfed cotton in Florida to maximize yield and economic returns while promoting sustainable agricultural practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1479 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Lint yield did not increase significantly beyond 101 kg N ha −1.

    Nitrogen rate optimization for irrigated cotton in Florida · 2025 · compared with 101 kg N ha −1

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.