Paper · 2025 · Plant Health Progress

Cotton Variety Evaluation with and Without Velum for Root-Knot Nematode Management in Central Alabama, 2024

Bisho R. Lawaju; Prativa Chhetri; Gayatri Bhandari; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita) is a major pathogen of cotton, causing root galling, stunted growth, and yield losses. This study evaluated the efficacy of nematicides and resistant cotton varieties in managing root-knot nematode infestations. Field trials were conducted at Auburn University's Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, AL, in 2024, using four cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum) varieties: DP 2038 B3XF, DP 2131 B3TXF, DP 2143NR B3XF, and DP 2349NR B3XF. Nematicide treatments included Velum (in-furrow), Copeo (seed treatment), a combination of both, and an untreated control. Results showed that integrating resistant varieties and nematicides improved root-knot nematode management and cotton productivity, highlighting the potential benefits of combining these strategies for sustainable nematode control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating resistant varieties and nematicides improved root-knot nematode management.

Treatment
integrating resistant varieties and nematicidese1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root-knot nematode managemente1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita) is a major pathogen of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that integrating resistant varieties and nematicides improved root-knot nematode management and cotton productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating resistant varieties and nematicides improved cotton productivity.

Treatment
integrating resistant varieties and nematicidese1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
cotton productivitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita) is a major pathogen of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that integrating resistant varieties and nematicides improved root-knot nematode management and cotton productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–721 · show in text ↑

insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.