Paper · 2025 · New Phytologist

Nectar in oak savannas: implications for butterfly conservation

Meigan Turner; Kevin E. McCluney; Ryan P. Walsh; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Restoring critically imperiled midwestern oak savanna habitat is frequently guided by the requirements of the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Plebejus melissa samuelis). Although studies often correlate butterfly population size or density with nectar species abundance, nectar characteristics are seldom considered. We compared floral nectar resources across 15 sites categorized by Karner blue butterfly occupancy by quantifying the floral abundance, nectar volume, and sugar concentration for 22 species, calculating their mean nectar availability per stem, measuring environmental variables, and estimating a species' nectar sugar contribution to the landscape across seasons. Species identity predicted nectar volume and sugar concentrations. Mean nectar volume ranged between 0.02 and 2.20 μl and sugar ranged between 3.06% and 61.26% Brix per flower. Rubus flagellaris and Ceanothus americanus contributed the most nectar sugar per stem in the spring and summer, respectively. Sites with a history of occupation had 11 times greater nectar sugar available in the spring than previous release locations or restorations without occupation. Improved understanding of seasonal distribution, quality, and abundance of oak savanna nectar resources is likely to aid habitat restoration planning and conservation efforts for pollinators of this critically imperiled habitat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species identity predicted nectar volume and sugar concentration.

Taxon
oak savannast0
Material
Species identitye0
Outcome
nectar volume and sugar concentrationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“oak savannas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Species identity predicted nectar volume and sugar concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean nectar volume ranged from 0.02 to 2.20 μl per flower.

Taxon
oak savannast0
Outcome
Mean nectar volumee0
Value
0.02 and 2.20 μle0

Verbatim

t0

“oak savannas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mean nectar volume ranged between 0.02 and 2.20 μl and sugar ranged between 3.06% and 61.26% Brix per flower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nectar sugar ranged from 3.06% to 61.26% Brix per flower.

Taxon
oak savannast0
Outcome
sugare0
Value
3.06% and 61.26% Brixe0

Verbatim

t0

“oak savannas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“sugar ranged between 3.06% and 61.26% Brix per flower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus flagellaris contributed the most nectar sugar per stem in spring.

Taxon
Rubus flagellarisRubus flagellarise0
Outcome
nectar sugar per steme0
Direction
moste0
Qualifier
springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus flagellaris
Rubus flagellaris · TaxonJames H. Miller & Ted Bodner, Southern Weed Science Society, Bugwood.org · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubus flagellaris and Ceanothus americanus contributed the most nectar sugar per stem in the spring and summer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceanothus americanus contributed the most nectar sugar per stem in summer.

Taxon
Ceanothus americanusCeanothus americanuse0
Outcome
nectar sugar per steme0
Direction
moste0
Qualifier
summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceanothus americanus
Ceanothus americanus · Taxonunknown author, USFWS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubus flagellaris and Ceanothus americanus contributed the most nectar sugar per stem in the spring and summer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Historically occupied sites had 11 times more spring nectar sugar than release or unoccupied restoration sites.

Taxon
oak savannast0
Outcome
nectar sugar availablee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11 timese0
Comparator
previous release locations or restorations without occupatione0

Verbatim

t0

“oak savannas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sites with a history of occupation had 11 times greater nectar sugar available in the spring than previous release locations or restorations without occupation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1156 · show in text ↑