Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Can foliar application of soluble monoammonium phosphate effectively alleviate herbicide-induced oxidative stress in key crops?

Josiane Viveiros; Luiz Gustavo Moretti; Israel Alves Filho; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) directly impact final crop productivity by playing essential roles in photosynthesis, ATP formation, carbon assimilation, cell division, and transport. Compared with nutrient application to soil, the nutrients are applied directly to leaves provides a faster response because the nutrients enter plant metabolism more quickly. Foliar fertilization with nutritional supplements can intend to increase crop yields, and little is known about its ability to reduce oxidative stress. This study evaluated the effects of foliar fertilization on crop recovery from phytotoxicity induced by herbicide exposure. Phytotoxicity was induced in soybean, maize, and cotton plants by applying the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl (at V 3 , V 3 and V 4 growth stages, respectively), which induces the accumulation of reactive oxygen species in the cytoplasm, leading to membrane rupture and the appearance of chlorotic spots on leaves. Phytotoxicity induction was followed by the foliar application of monoammonium phosphate (MAP) as a source of N and P. Leaf nutrient content, gas exchange performance, pigment content, photosynthetic enzyme activity, antioxidant metabolism, oxidative stress, proline content, metabolite content, and biometric parameters were evaluated. MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively, resulting in higher net photosynthetic rates (26.3%; cotton), stomatal conductance (45.7%; cotton), water use efficiency (35.6%; cotton), and carboxylation efficiency (45%; cotton). The activities of antioxidant enzymes also increased, and the concentrations of oxidative stress indicators decreased (H 2 O 2 : 33.7% and MDA: 28.3%; soybean). Furthermore, the productivity of all three crops increased, suggesting that foliar application of MAP is an efficient strategy for attenuating phytotoxicity symptoms in crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased chlorophyll content in maize by up to 20.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
MAP supplementatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased RuBisCO activity in cotton by up to 16.2%.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione0
Gene
RuBisCOe0
Outcome
RuBisCO activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton net photosynthetic rate was higher by 26.3% after MAP supplementation.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively, resulting in higher net photosynthetic rates (26.3%; cotton), stomatal conductance (45.7%; cotton), water use efficiency (35.6%; cotton), and carboxylation efficiency (45%; cotton).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton stomatal conductance was higher by 45.7% after MAP supplementation.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
45.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net photosynthetic rates (26.3%; cotton), stomatal conductance (45.7%; cotton), water use efficiency (35.6%; cotton), and carboxylation efficiency (45%; cotton).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton water use efficiency was higher by 35.6% after MAP supplementation.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
35.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net photosynthetic rates (26.3%; cotton), stomatal conductance (45.7%; cotton), water use efficiency (35.6%; cotton), and carboxylation efficiency (45%; cotton).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton carboxylation efficiency was higher by 45% after MAP supplementation.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
carboxylation efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher net photosynthetic rates (26.3%; cotton), stomatal conductance (45.7%; cotton), water use efficiency (35.6%; cotton), and carboxylation efficiency (45%; cotton).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content, and RuBisCO activity by up to 20.5% (maize) and 16.2% (cotton), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
soybean, maize, and cottonGossypium hirsutumGlycine maxZea mayse2
Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of antioxidant enzymes also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1649 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
e2

“soybean, maize, and cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP decreased soybean H 2 O 2 concentration by 33.7%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
H 2 O 2e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentrations of oxidative stress indicators decreased (H 2 O 2 : 33.7% and MDA: 28.3%; soybean).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1757 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP decreased soybean MDA concentration by 28.3%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
MAP supplementatione1
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentrations of oxidative stress indicators decreased (H 2 O 2 : 33.7% and MDA: 28.3%; soybean).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1757 · show in text ↑
e1

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased soybean productivity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
MAP supplementatione2
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of all three crops increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phytotoxicity was induced in soybean, maize, and cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–697 · show in text ↑
e2

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased maize productivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
MAP supplementatione2
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of all three crops increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phytotoxicity was induced in soybean, maize, and cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–697 · show in text ↑
e2

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP increased cotton productivity.

Treatment
MAP supplementatione2
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of all three crops increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phytotoxicity was induced in soybean, maize, and cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–697 · show in text ↑
e2

“MAP supplementation increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1335 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend foliar MAP to attenuate crop phytotoxicity symptoms.

Taxon
cropse0
Treatment
foliar application of MAPe0
Outcome
attenuating phytotoxicity symptomse0

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of MAP is an efficient strategy for attenuating phytotoxicity symptoms in crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1932 · show in text ↑

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · physiology: oxidative · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.