Paper · 2025 · Plants

Unveiling Drought Tolerant Cotton Genotypes: Insights from Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Markers at Flowering

Muhammad Yousaf Shani; Muhammad Yasin Ashraf; Muhammad Ramzan; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress substantially restricts cotton growth, decreasing cotton production potential worldwide. This study evaluated cotton genotypes at the flowering stage to identify drought-resilient genotypes under moderate and severe drought conditions using physio-morphic and biochemical markers. Five genotypes were examined in a completely randomized design with three replicates across three treatments. Growth and biochemical traits were measured after 14 days of drought stress. The Multi-trait Genotype-Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI) identified the most drought-tolerant genotypes. Severe drought had a pronounced negative effect on growth and biochemical traits, followed by moderate drought. Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited the strongest resilience, with significant increases in proline, peroxidase, catalase, and total chlorophyll. In contrast, chlorophyll a and transpiration rates were largely unaffected. Genotypes VH-351, VH-281, and GH-99 showed moderate drought tolerance, while FH-556 was highly sensitive to water stress. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA, PCA, and heatmaps, confirmed FH-912's superior performance under drought stress. The drought-resilient genotype, FH-912, holds promise for breeding drought-tolerant cotton varieties to sustain cotton productivity in water-limited environments, especially in drought-prone regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought impaired growth and biochemical traits more than moderate drought.

Treatment
Severe droughte0
Outcome
growth and biochemical traitse0
Direction
negative effecte0
Comparator
moderate droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe drought had a pronounced negative effect on growth and biochemical traits, followed by moderate drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-912 was identified as the strongest drought resilient genotype.

Material
FH-912e0
Outcome
strongest resiliencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited the strongest resilience”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-912 showed a significant increase in proline.

Material
FH-912e0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FH-912 exhibited the strongest resilience, with significant increases in proline, peroxidase, catalase, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–737 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth and biochemical traits were measured after 14 days of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-912 showed significant increases in peroxidase and catalase.

Material
FH-912e1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
peroxidase, catalasee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in proline, peroxidase, catalase, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–737 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth and biochemical traits were measured after 14 days of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-912 showed a significant increase in total chlorophyll.

Material
FH-912e1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in proline, peroxidase, catalase, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–737 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth and biochemical traits were measured after 14 days of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and transpiration rates were largely unaffected.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
chlorophyll a and transpiration ratese0
Direction
largely unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll a and transpiration rates were largely unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the genotypes, FH-912 exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–737 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth and biochemical traits were measured after 14 days of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VH-351 showed moderate drought tolerance.

Material
VH-351e0
Outcome
moderate drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes VH-351, VH-281, and GH-99 showed moderate drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VH-281 showed moderate drought tolerance.

Material
VH-281e0
Outcome
moderate drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes VH-351, VH-281, and GH-99 showed moderate drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GH-99 showed moderate drought tolerance.

Material
GH-99e0
Outcome
moderate drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes VH-351, VH-281, and GH-99 showed moderate drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-556 was highly sensitive to water stress.

Material
FH-556e0
Outcome
highly sensitive to water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FH-556 was highly sensitive to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ANOVA, PCA, and heatmaps corroborated superior drought performance of FH-912.

Material
FH-912e0
Outcome
superior performance under drought stresse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical analyses, including ANOVA, PCA, and heatmaps, confirmed FH-912's superior performance under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 5 positive, 13 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.