Paper · 2025 · Microorganisms

Enhancing Sorghum Growth: Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Sorgoleone

Isabela Figueiredo de Oliveira; Maria Lúcia Ferreira Simeone; Ubiraci Gomes de Paula Lana; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The low availability of phosphorus (P) in soil is one of the main constraints on crop production. Plants have developed several strategies to increase P use efficiency, including modifications in root morphology, the exudation of different compounds, and associations with microorganisms such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). This study aimed to investigate the effect of sorgoleone compound on AMF colonization and its subsequent impact on P uptake, rhizosphere microbiota, and sorghum growth. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using the sorghum genotype P9401, known for low sorgoleone production. Three doses of purified sorgoleone (20 μM, 40 μM, and 80 μM) were added to low-P soil and plants were harvested after 45 days. Treatments included inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Rhizophagus clarus and a negative control without inoculum. The addition of 40 and 80 μM of sorgoleone did not significantly increase mycorrhization. However, treatment with 20 μM sorgoleone combined with R. clarus inoculation significantly increased total sorghum biomass by 1.6-fold (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the non-inoculated treatment. AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either. The activities of acid and alkaline phosphatases in the rhizospheric soil did not differ significantly among the treatments. Furthermore, the sorghum genes CYP71AM1, associated with sorgoleone biosynthesis, and Sb02g009880, Sb06g002560, Sb06g002540, and Sb03g029970 (related to phosphate transport induced by mycorrhiza) were significantly upregulated (p ≤ 0.05) in fine roots under these conditions. The 20 μM concentration of sorgoleone can enhance AMF colonization in sorghum and promote plant growth under low-P conditions, without significantly altering the microbiota.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 μM, sorgoleone did not significantly increase mycorrhization.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
40e0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungit0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 40 and 80 μM of sorgoleone did not significantly increase mycorrhization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Growth: Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80 μM, sorgoleone did not significantly increase mycorrhization.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
80 μM of sorgoleonee0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungit0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 40 and 80 μM of sorgoleone did not significantly increase mycorrhization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Growth: Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

20 μM sorgoleone with R. clarus inoculation increased total sorghum biomass 1.6-fold relative to non-inoculated treatment.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
20 μM sorgoleone combined with R. clarus inoculatione0
Interactor
R. clarusRhizophagus claruse0symbiont
Outcome
total sorghum biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.6-folde0
Comparator
non-inoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, treatment with 20 μM sorgoleone combined with R. clarus inoculation significantly increased total sorghum biomass by 1.6-fold (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the non-inoculated treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation affected AMF colonization.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonizatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation affected fungal microbiota.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
fungal microbiotae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation did not affect the bacterial community.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial communitye0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorgoleone had no effect on the fungal microbiota.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
sorgoleonee0
Outcome
fungal microbiotae0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorgoleone had no effect on the bacterial community.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
sorgoleonee0
Outcome
bacterial communitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation influenced only AMF colonization and the fungal microbiota, without affecting the bacterial community, whereas sorgoleone showed no effect on either.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere acid and alkaline phosphatase activities did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
activities of acid and alkaline phosphatases in the rhizospheric soile0
Direction
did not differ significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of acid and alkaline phosphatases in the rhizospheric soil did not differ significantly among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CYP71AM1 expression was upregulated in fine roots under the reported conditions.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Organ / stage
fine rootse0
Gene
CYP71AM1e0
Outcome
significantly upregulatede0
Direction
upregulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the sorghum genes CYP71AM1, associated with sorgoleone biosynthesis, and Sb02g009880, Sb06g002560, Sb06g002540, and Sb03g029970 (related to phosphate transport induced by mycorrhiza) were significantly upregulated (p ≤ 0.05) in fine roots under these conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four phosphate transport related sorghum genes were upregulated in fine roots.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Organ / stage
fine rootse0
Gene
Sb02g009880, Sb06g002560, Sb06g002540, and Sb03g029970e0
Outcome
significantly upregulatede0
Direction
upregulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the sorghum genes CYP71AM1, associated with sorgoleone biosynthesis, and Sb02g009880, Sb06g002560, Sb06g002540, and Sb03g029970 (related to phosphate transport induced by mycorrhiza) were significantly upregulated (p ≤ 0.05) in fine roots under these conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1718 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 20 μM sorgoleone can enhance AMF colonization in sorghum under low P.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
20 μM concentration of sorgoleonee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
enhance AMF colonization in sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 20 μM concentration of sorgoleone can enhance AMF colonization in sorghum and promote plant growth under low-P conditions, without significantly altering the microbiota.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1892 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 20 μM sorgoleone can promote sorghum growth under low P.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
20 μM concentration of sorgoleonee0
Outcome
promote plant growth under low-P conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 20 μM concentration of sorgoleone can enhance AMF colonization in sorghum and promote plant growth under low-P conditions, without significantly altering the microbiota.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1892 · show in text ↑

sorgoleone · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Rhizophagus clarus · growth · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.