Abstract
The experiment was carried out at Regional Horticultural Research Station (RHRS) and Instructional Farm, ASPEE College of Horticulture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari during the year 2021-22 and 2023-24. The experiment was implemented as a randomized block design with factorial concept with three replications consisting three factors viz., A) source of nutrient with three levels (N1 - 100% RDF, N2 - 80% RDF and N3 - 70% RDF + 25% Castor cake), B) Time of application with two levels (M1: 2, 4, 6 and 8 month after planting and M2: N at the time of planting and 2, 4, 6 and 8 MAP, P: 50% at planting and 50% at 4 MAP, K: 4, 6 and 8 MAP), C) Biofertilizer with two levels (B0: Without biofertilizer and B1: With Biofertilizer). The results were pooled of two years. The combined effect of various sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizer treatment registered maximum plant height, stem girth, number of leaves per plant at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant. Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1 i.e. 70% RDF (FYM 5 kg plant-1, NPK 140: 140: 175 g plant-1) + 25% Castor cake at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after planting along with application of biofertilizer i.e. PSB @ 5 ml plant-1 after the establishment of seedlings, Azotobacter @ 5 ml plant-1 at 5 MAP and KMB @ 5 ml plant-1at 5 and 7 MAP equally i.e. 2.5 ml in pooled analysis. The influence of sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizer failed to show any significant effect on plant height at fruit inception, days taken for initiation of flowering and days taken for first harvest in pooled analysis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum plant height at 4 MAP of 133.56.
- Taxon
- papaya
_-_DPLA_-_55200ec009622d7d42349f3583df310e.jpg?width=60)
Carica papayat0 - Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 133.56e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_-_DPLA_-_55200ec009622d7d42349f3583df310e.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum plant height at 6 MAP of 186.78.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 186.78e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum plant height at 8 MAP of 238.97 cm.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 238.97 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum stem girth at 4 MAP of 24.95.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- stem girthe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 24.95e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum stem girth at 6 MAP of 40.36.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- stem girthe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 40.36e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum stem girth at 8 MAP of 56.04 cm.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- stem girthe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 56.04 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum number of leaves per plant at 4 MAP of 20.33.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 20.33e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum number of leaves per plant at 6 MAP of 29.53.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 4, 6 and 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 29.53e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum number of leaves per plant at 8 MAP of 42.20.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 42.20e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N3M1B1 gave maximum total number of leaves per plant at 8 MAP of 52.03.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Organ / stage
- 8 MAPe0
- Treatment
- N3M1B1e0
- Outcome
- total number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 52.03e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum average plant height (133.56, 186.78 and 238.97 cm, respectively), stem girth (24.95, 40.36 and 56.04 cm, respectively), number of leaves per plant (20.33, 29.53 and 42.20, respectively) at 4, 6 and 8 MAP and total number of leaves per plant (52.03) was recorded in treatment combination N3M1B1”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient source, timing, and biofertilizer had no significant effect on plant height at fruit inception.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant height at fruit inceptione0
- Direction
- failed to show any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The influence of sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizer failed to show any significant effect on plant height at fruit inception, days taken for initiation of flowering and days taken for first harvest in pooled analysis”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient source, timing, and biofertilizer had no significant effect on time to flowering initiation.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- days taken for initiation of floweringe0
- Direction
- failed to show any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The influence of sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizer failed to show any significant effect on plant height at fruit inception, days taken for initiation of flowering and days taken for first harvest in pooled analysis”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient source, timing, and biofertilizer had no significant effect on time to first harvest.
- Taxon
- papayaCarica papayat0
- Treatment
- sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- days taken for first harveste0
- Direction
- failed to show any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The influence of sources, time of nutrient application and biofertilizer failed to show any significant effect on plant height at fruit inception, days taken for initiation of flowering and days taken for first harvest in pooled analysis”
t0“papaya (Carica papaya L.)”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Carica papaya (papaya)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →inoculation · phenology · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
inoculation · yield · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · phenology · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →fertilization · growth · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.