Abstract
Tomato leaf minor (Tuta absoluta ) is a noxious insect pests of tomato crop globally, cause huge losses of tomato in every season. Therefore, the present research was conducted to evaluate effectiveness of management trapping devices for T. absoluta in tomato field. Management traps show varied significantly in their effectiveness to capture moths, maximum mean (25.25±3.52) moths were caught by delta pheromone trap followed by light traps (14.78±1.89), color sticky traps (10.23±2.67) and water pan trap (5.61±01.56), respectively. Due to maximum capture of adult in delta pheromone trap, light trap devices and cultural practices, the lowest (11.90±2.67 %) tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %). However, lowest (05.59±03.62 %) infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %), respectively. Results showed the highest yield (6546.60 kg/acre) was obtained in the plots where delta type pheromone traps were installed, followed by plots in which cultural practices were carried out (6476.80 kg/acre), light traps (5943.70 kg/acre), color sticky trap (5863.20 kg/acre), water pan trap (5684.30 kg/acre) and in control (5426.00 kg/acre). The maximum cost benefit ratio (4:18) from the plots where delta pheromone traps were installed followed by cultural practices (4:16), light traps (4:12), color sticky traps (4:10), water pan trap (4:07) and control (4:02), respectively. The highest adult attraction and lowest crop damage with maximum fruit production was recorded after the application delta pheromone traps with cultural practices, thus it is recommended; that the delta pheromone traps along with cultural practices are the convenient practices to monitor and control adult population of tomato leaf miner in infested tomato field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Delta pheromone traps caught the most leaf miner moths, averaging 25.25±3.52.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- delta pheromone trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTA
.jpg?width=60)
Tuta absolutat0pest - Outcome
- capture mothse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 25.25±3.52e0
- Comparator
- light trapse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Management traps show varied significantly in their effectiveness to capture moths, maximum mean (25.25±3.52) moths were caught by delta pheromone trap followed by light traps (14.78±1.89), color sticky traps (10.23±2.67) and water pan trap (5.61±01.56), respectively.”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Light traps caught 14.78±1.89 moths on average.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- light trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- mothse0
- Value
- 14.78±1.89e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moths were caught by delta pheromone trap followed by light traps (14.78±1.89)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Color sticky traps caught 10.23±2.67 moths on average.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- color sticky trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- TUTA ABSOLUTAt0
- Value
- 10.23±2.67e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“color sticky traps (10.23±2.67)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Water pan traps caught 5.61±01.56 moths on average.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- water pan trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- TUTA ABSOLUTAt0
- Value
- 5.61±01.56e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water pan trap (5.61±01.56)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Delta pheromone traps had the lowest tomato leaf infestation at 11.90±2.67%.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- delta type pheromone trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 11.90±2.67 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest (11.90±2.67 %) tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultural practices had 13±2.80% tomato leaf infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- cultural practicese0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Value
- 13±2.80 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Light traps had 15.35±3.12% tomato leaf infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- light trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Value
- 15.35±3.12 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Color sticky traps had 20.00±2.80% tomato leaf infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- color sticky trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Value
- 20.00±2.80 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Water pan traps had 31.13±05.56% tomato leaf infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- water pan trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Value
- 31.13±05.56 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plots had 35.13±04.50% tomato leaf infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- controle0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- tomato leaves infestatione0
- Value
- 35.13±04.50 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato leaves infestation was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (13±2.80 %), light traps (15.35±3.12 %), color sticky traps (20.00±2.80 %), water pan trap (31.13±05.56 %) and control (35.13±04.50 %).”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Delta pheromone traps had the lowest tomato fruit infestation at 05.59±03.62%.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- delta type pheromone trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 05.59±03.62 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest (05.59±03.62 %) infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultural practices had 8.50±2.1% tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- cultural practicese0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Value
- 8.50±2.1 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Light traps had 09.64±02.88% tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- light trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Value
- 09.64±02.88 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Color sticky traps had 13.81±03.10% tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- color sticky trapse0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Value
- 13.81±03.10 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Water pan traps had 19.88±03.15% tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- water pan trape0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Value
- 19.88±03.15 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plots had 22.10±04.50% tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TOMATOESt1
- Treatment
- controle0
- Interactor
- TUTA ABSOLUTATuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- infestation tomato fruite0
- Value
- 22.10±04.50 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“infestation tomato fruit was recorded in delta type pheromone trap followed by cultural practices (8.50±2.1 %), light traps (09.64±02.88 %), color sticky traps (13.81±03.10 %), water pan trap (19.88±03.15 %) and control (22.10±04.50 %)”
t0“TUTA ABSOLUTA”
t1“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Delta pheromone trap plots yielded the most tomatoes at 6546.60 kg/acre.
Verbatim
e0“highest yield (6546.60 kg/acre) was obtained in the plots where delta type pheromone traps were installed, followed by plots in which cultural practices were carried out (6476.80 kg/acre), light traps (5943.70 kg/acre), color sticky trap (5863.20 kg/acre), water pan trap (5684.30 kg/acre) and in control (5426.00 kg/acre).”
t0“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultural practice plots yielded 6476.80 kg/acre.
Verbatim
e0“yield (6546.60 kg/acre) was obtained in the plots where delta type pheromone traps were installed, followed by plots in which cultural practices were carried out (6476.80 kg/acre)”
t0“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Delta pheromone trap plots had the maximum cost benefit ratio of 4:18.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum cost benefit ratio (4:18) from the plots where delta pheromone traps were installed”
t0“TOMATOES”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend delta pheromone traps with cultural practices to monitor and control tomato leaf miner.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- delta pheromone traps along with cultural practicese0
- Interactor
- tomato leaf miner
Liriomyza bryoniaee0pest - Outcome
- monitor and control adult population of tomato leaf minere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it is recommended; that the delta pheromone traps along with cultural practices are the convenient practices to monitor and control adult population of tomato leaf miner in infested tomato field.”
The same questions in other papers
Delta baryon · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Delta baryon · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
pheromone · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
pheromone · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →trap barrier · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →trap barrier · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.