Abstract
The present investigation was undertaken in the Department of Horticulture, Allahabad Agricultural Institute, Naini, Allahabad during the winter season of 1998-99 in a randomized block design with sixteen treatments replicated three times. The number of shoots per plant increased significantly with increasing number of sprays of urea (2%). Delayed spray of urea decreased number of leaves per plant. Leaf area per plant increased significantly with increasing number of sprays. The number and weight of corms and cormels produced per plant decreased with increasing frequency of urea. Propagation coeffecient significantly decreased with increasing number of spray treatments of urea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The number of shoots per plant increased significantly with an increasing number of 2% urea sprays.
- Material
- AMERICAN BEAUTYt0
- Treatment
- increasing number of sprays of urea (2%)e0
- Outcome
- number of shoots per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
GladiolusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of shoots per plant increased significantly with increasing number of sprays of urea (2%)”
t0“GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed urea spray decreased the number of leaves per plant.
- Material
- AMERICAN BEAUTYt0
- Treatment
- Delayed spray of ureae0
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Delayed spray of urea decreased number of leaves per plant”
t0“GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area per plant increased significantly with an increasing number of urea sprays.
- Material
- AMERICAN BEAUTYt0
- Treatment
- increasing number of sprayse0
- Outcome
- Leaf area per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf area per plant increased significantly with increasing number of sprays”
t0“GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY”
Claim · model-written summary
The number and weight of corms and cormels produced per plant decreased with increasing frequency of urea spraying.
- Material
- AMERICAN BEAUTYt0
- Treatment
- increasing frequency of ureae0
- Outcome
- number and weight of corms and cormels produced per plante0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number and weight of corms and cormels produced per plant decreased with increasing frequency of urea”
t0“GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY”
Claim · model-written summary
The propagation coefficient decreased significantly with an increasing number of urea spray treatments.
- Material
- AMERICAN BEAUTYt0
- Treatment
- increasing number of spray treatments of ureae0
- Outcome
- Propagation coeffeciente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Propagation coeffecient significantly decreased with increasing number of spray treatments of urea”
t0“GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →application · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →nitrogen · growth · GladiolusResults agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.