Abstract
The results of the application of growth biological preparations on winter wheat crops in the steppe zone of the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania are presented. The purpose of research is to study the effect of biological preparations Edagum SM, Furolan Zh, Vitazim VR in order to increase the yield of winter wheat with high quality indicators. Objectives: to determine the characteristics of the growth and development of winter wheat, depending on the use of the studied preparations; to establish the influence of the studied plant growth regulators on the yield and quality of the products obtained; to give an economic assessment of the use of growth regulators Edagum SM, Furolan Zh, Vitazim VR in the cultivation of winter wheat. The studies were carried out in 2020–2022 on the experimental fields of the Vladikavkaz Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, located in the Mozdok Region of North Ossetia–Alania. The soils of the experimental plot are calcareous chestnut, according to their mechanical composition they are classified as heavy loamy coarse silt-silt. The content of humus, depending on the mechanical composition, ranges from 2.22 to 3.45 %. The introduction of growth regulators made it possible to obtain a high yield with quality indicators of grain. The biological product Edagum SM turned out to be the best in terms of yield, the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha, Furolan Zh – 0.99, Vitazim VR – 0.69. Similar indicators of yield increase in the Yumpa variety are 1.35 t/ha, 0.99, 0.77 t/ha, respectively. When plants are treated with biological preparations, the quality indicators of winter wheat grain are improved, where the gluten content for the studied varieties increases by 4.4%, with the use of Furolan Zh biological preparations by 4.0 % and Vitazim VR – by 1.2 %. The use of Edagum SM increased profitability by 54.8 %, Furolan Zh – by 28.5, Vitazim VR – by 12.6 %. When growth regulators are introduced, the level of profitability increases by 15.8–40.3 % compared to the control (Yumpa variety).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Edagum SM increased Grom yield by 1.36 t/ha over control.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- Grome0
- Treatment
- Edagum SMe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1.36 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control variety Grome0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Edagum SM turned out to be the best in terms of yield, the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha”
e1“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Furolan Zh increased Grom yield by 0.99 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- Grome1
- Treatment
- Furolan Zhe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 0.99e0
- Comparator
- control variety Grome1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furolan Zh – 0.99”
e1“the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha”
e2“winter wheat crops”
e3“Edagum SM turned out to be the best in terms of yield, the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Vitazim VR increased Grom yield by 0.69 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- Grome1
- Treatment
- Vitazim VRe0
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 0.69e0
- Comparator
- control variety Grome1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vitazim VR – 0.69”
e1“the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha”
e2“winter wheat crops”
e3“Edagum SM turned out to be the best in terms of yield, the increase in comparison with the control variety Grom was 1.36 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Edagum SM increased Yumpa yield by 1.35 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- Yumpae0
- Treatment
- Edagum SMe1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1.35 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similar indicators of yield increase in the Yumpa variety are 1.35 t/ha, 0.99, 0.77 t/ha, respectively.”
e1“Edagum SM turned out to be the best in terms of yield”
e2“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Furolan Zh increased Yumpa yield by 0.99 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- Yumpae0
- Treatment
- Furolan Zhe1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.99e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similar indicators of yield increase in the Yumpa variety are 1.35 t/ha, 0.99, 0.77 t/ha, respectively.”
e1“Furolan Zh – 0.99”
e2“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Vitazim VR increased Yumpa yield by 0.77 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- Yumpae0
- Treatment
- Vitazim VRe1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.77 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similar indicators of yield increase in the Yumpa variety are 1.35 t/ha, 0.99, 0.77 t/ha, respectively.”
e1“Vitazim VR – 0.69”
e2“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Edagum SM increased grain gluten content by 4.4%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- Edagum SMe1
- Outcome
- gluten contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 4.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the gluten content for the studied varieties increases by 4.4%”
e1“The use of Edagum SM increased profitability”
e2“winter wheat grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Furolan Zh increased grain gluten content by 4.0%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Furolan Zhe0
- Outcome
- gluten contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 4.0 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the gluten content for the studied varieties increases by 4.4%, with the use of Furolan Zh biological preparations by 4.0 %”
e1“winter wheat grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Vitazim VR increased grain gluten content by 1.2%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Vitazim VRe0
- Outcome
- gluten contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 1.2 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the gluten content for the studied varieties increases by 4.4%, with the use of Furolan Zh biological preparations by 4.0 % and Vitazim VR – by 1.2 %.”
e1“winter wheat grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Edagum SM increased profitability by 54.8%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Edagum SMe0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 54.8 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of Edagum SM increased profitability by 54.8 %”
e1“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Furolan Zh increased profitability by 28.5%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- Furolan Zhe0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 28.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furolan Zh – by 28.5”
e1“The use of Edagum SM increased profitability by 54.8 %”
e2“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Vitazim VR increased profitability by 12.6%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- Vitazim VRe0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 12.6 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vitazim VR – by 12.6 %”
e1“The use of Edagum SM increased profitability by 54.8 %”
e2“winter wheat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators increased Yumpa profitability by 15.8–40.3% versus control.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- Yumpae0
- Treatment
- growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 15.8–40.3 %e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When growth regulators are introduced, the level of profitability increases by 15.8–40.3 % compared to the control (Yumpa variety).”
e1“winter wheat crops”
The same questions in other papers
class · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.