Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Impact of Deficit Drip Irrigation with Brackish Water on Soil Water–Salt Dynamics and Maize Yield in Film-Mulched Fields

Tongkai Guo; Xi Huang; Kewei Feng; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity, while the abundance of brackish water highlights the opportunity for its effective and sustainable utilization. A 2-year field experiment (2022–2023) was conducted in the Shiyang River Basin to investigate the impacts of deficit irrigation with brackish water on soil moisture, salinity, temperature, crop growth index, yield, and water productivity. Six treatments were implemented, consisting of two irrigation levels (W1: 75%I, W2: 100%I) and three water quality gradients (S0: 0.7 g L−1, S1: 3.7 g L−1, S2: 5.7 g L−1 in 2022 and 7.7 g L−1 in 2023). Results indicated that brackish irrigation (except S0) increased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at higher levels, while decreased maize yield, and water productivity (WP). Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP. Path analysis of soil hydrothermal salinity and crop growth indicators demonstrated that soil salinity changes play a crucial role in determining maize plant height and yield. S0W2 (100% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) achieved the highest maize yield, with S0W1 yielding 5.15% less. However, the water productivity (WP) of S0W1 was 17.66% higher than that of S0W2. Therefore, considering the combined factors of maize yield, water productivity, and water-saving benefits, the use of S0W1 (75% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brackish irrigation increased soil salinity.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
brackish irrigation (except S0)e1
Outcome
soil salinitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that brackish irrigation (except S0) increased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at higher levels, while decreased maize yield, and water productivity (WP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brackish irrigation kept soil water storage at higher levels.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
brackish irrigation (except S0)e1
Outcome
soil water storagee1
Direction
higher levelse1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that brackish irrigation (except S0) increased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at higher levels, while decreased maize yield, and water productivity (WP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brackish irrigation decreased maize yield and water productivity (WP).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
brackish irrigation (except S0)e1
Outcome
maize yield, and water productivity (WP)e1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that brackish irrigation (except S0) increased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at higher levels, while decreased maize yield, and water productivity (WP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
soil salinitye2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
full irrigation at the same salinity levele2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation kept soil water storage at lower levels than full irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
soil water storagee2
Direction
lower levelse2
Comparator
full irrigation at the same salinity levele2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation increased soil temperature.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
soil temperaturee2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
full irrigation at the same salinity levele2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation lowered maize yield compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
maize yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
full irrigation at the same salinity levele2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation raised water productivity (WP) compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione2
Outcome
WPe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
full irrigation at the same salinity levele2

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with full irrigation at the same salinity level, deficit irrigation decreased soil salinity, keeping the soil water storage at lower levels, while increasing soil temperature, which led to lower maize yield but resulted in higher WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1081 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salinity changes play a crucial role in determining maize plant height and yield in path analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
soil salinity changese3
Outcome
maize plant height and yielde3
Qualifier
crucial rolee3

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Path analysis of soil hydrothermal salinity and crop growth indicators demonstrated that soil salinity changes play a crucial role in determining maize plant height and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S0W2 (100% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) gave the highest maize yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S0W2 (100% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1)e4
Outcome
maize yielde4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“S0W2 (100% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) achieved the highest maize yield, with S0W1 yielding 5.15% less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S0W1 yielded 5.15% less maize than S0W2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S0W1e4
Outcome
maize yielde4
Direction
lesse4
Value
5.15%e4
Comparator
S0W2e4

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“S0W2 (100% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) achieved the highest maize yield, with S0W1 yielding 5.15% less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S0W1 had 17.66% higher water productivity (WP) than S0W2.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S0W1e5
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e5
Direction
highere5
Value
17.66%e5
Comparator
S0W2e5

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize production in the arid and semi-arid regions of northwest China is limited by water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, the water productivity (WP) of S0W1 was 17.66% higher than that of S0W2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1438 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

S0W1 (75% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) is recommended for maize considering yield, water productivity and water saving.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Outcome
use of S0W1 (75% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1)e6

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Therefore, considering the combined factors of maize yield, water productivity, and water-saving benefits, the use of S0W1 (75% irrigation, 0.7 g L−1) is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1605 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

324 papers: 284 positive, 40 negative or no effect

283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

320 papers more in this group

See all 324 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.