Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Dynamic Water and Fertilizer Management Strategy for Greenhouse Tomato Based on Morphological Characteristics

Zhiyu Zuo; Tianyuan Lü; Jicheng Sun; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A dynamic management strategy for water and fertilizer application based on morphological characteristics was developed to enhance water use efficiency (WUE) and fruit yield in greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Multivariate regression analysis was employed to determine the baseline water and fertilizer requirements and to evaluate the effects of varying irrigation and fertilization regimes on fruit yield and WUE. A coupled irrigation–fertilization experiment was conducted, and regression models were established to describe the changes in stem diameter and plant height under these regimes. These models were validated experimentally. The results showed that irrigation significantly influenced both tomato fruit yield and WUE, while fertilization significantly impacted yield, but not WUE. No interactive effects between irrigation and fertilization were observed for either parameter. Stem diameter and plant height were positively correlated with the irrigation and fertilization levels. The proposed dynamic management strategy improved fruit yield by 6.9% and 14.7% under the basic and well-irrigated/fertilized conditions, respectively, compared to that of the fixed regime. Furthermore, model implementation increased WUE by 6.93% and 43.17% and improved the economic benefits by 4.9% and 20.6% under the respective conditions. This provides a practical and effective tool for optimizing water and fertilizer management in greenhouse tomato production, contributing to resource-efficient and high-yield farming practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly influenced tomato fruit yield and WUE.

Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
tomato fruit yield and WUEe1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation significantly influenced both tomato fruit yield and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly impacted tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
fertilizatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization significantly impacted yield, but not WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not affect tomato WUE.

Treatment
fertilizatione2
Outcome
WUEe2
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization significantly impacted yield, but not WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–816 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No interaction between irrigation and fertilization was found for tomato yield or WUE.

Treatment
irrigation and fertilizatione3
Outcome
interactive effectse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e3

“No interactive effects between irrigation and fertilization were observed for either parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter and plant height were positively correlated with irrigation and fertilization levels in tomato.

Treatment
irrigation and fertilization levelse4
Outcome
Stem diameter and plant heighte4
Direction
positively correlatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stem diameter and plant height were positively correlated with the irrigation and fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dynamic strategy improved tomato fruit yield by 6.9% under basic conditions compared with a fixed regime.

Treatment
dynamic management strategye5
Outcome
fruit yielde5
Direction
improvede5
Value
6.9%e5
Qualifier
under the basice5
Comparator
fixed regimee5
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e5

“The proposed dynamic management strategy improved fruit yield by 6.9% and 14.7% under the basic and well-irrigated/fertilized conditions, respectively, compared to that of the fixed regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dynamic strategy improved tomato fruit yield by 14.7% under well-irrigated and fertilized conditions compared with a fixed regime.

Treatment
dynamic management strategye5
Outcome
fruit yielde5
Direction
improvede5
Value
14.7%e5
Qualifier
well-irrigated/fertilized conditionse5
Comparator
fixed regimee5
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e5

“The proposed dynamic management strategy improved fruit yield by 6.9% and 14.7% under the basic and well-irrigated/fertilized conditions, respectively, compared to that of the fixed regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model implementation increased tomato WUE by 6.93% under the basic conditions.

Treatment
model implementatione6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
increasede6
Value
6.93%e6
Qualifier
under the respective conditionse6
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“model implementation increased WUE by 6.93% and 43.17% and improved the economic benefits by 4.9% and 20.6% under the respective conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model implementation increased tomato WUE by 43.17% under well-irrigated and fertilized conditions.

Treatment
model implementatione6
Outcome
WUEe6
Direction
increasede6
Value
43.17%e6
Qualifier
under the respective conditionse6
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“model implementation increased WUE by 6.93% and 43.17% and improved the economic benefits by 4.9% and 20.6% under the respective conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model implementation improved economic benefits by 4.9% under basic conditions.

Treatment
model implementatione6
Outcome
economic benefitse6
Direction
improvede6
Value
4.9%e6
Qualifier
under the respective conditionse6
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“model implementation increased WUE by 6.93% and 43.17% and improved the economic benefits by 4.9% and 20.6% under the respective conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model implementation improved economic benefits by 20.6% under well-irrigated and fertilized conditions.

Treatment
model implementatione6
Outcome
economic benefitse6
Direction
improvede6
Value
20.6%e6
Qualifier
under the respective conditionse6
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse-cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“model implementation increased WUE by 6.93% and 43.17% and improved the economic benefits by 4.9% and 20.6% under the respective conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1360 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.