Abstract
Poor soil fertility and water holding capacity, coupled with climate change, threaten smallholder agriculture under dryland conditions, particularly in sandy soils. The resilience of sorghum makes it an ideal candidate crop for conservation agriculture (CA), under these conditions, but its productivity and effectiveness could depend on the cultivar used, planting time, tillage, and rotation. This study determined the effects of these factors on selected soil properties, growth and grain yield of two sorghum cultivars in sandy soils, under semi-arid conditions. The trial was conducted between 2019 and 2022 on a sandy soil with <10 % clay and <1.0 % carbon, at Clau-Clau village in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. The experiment had a randomized complete block design (RCBD) set up, in a strip-split-split-plot treatment structure with three replications. The treatment factors were tillage (conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT)), planting date (early and late), and rotation (with cowpea or sorghum monoculture) and sorghum cultivar (Pan 8816 and Macia). In the second growing season, early planted sorghum outperformed the late planted crop, with 44.4 % greater height and 36.1 % higher 1000-seed weight. Furthermore, the grain yield (1.33 and 0.56 t/ha, respectively) and dry matter yield (2.38 and 1.10 t/ha, respectively) were significantly higher for early than late planting in season 2. The NT treatment had significantly higher SOC, available P and exchangeable K than CT treatment in season 2. In season 3, early planting had 30.4 % higher exchangeable K than late planting, while NT increased total N and SOC by 50 and 34.8 %, respectively than CT. The findings of this study show the positive effects of early planting and NT on sorghum grain and dry matter yields, while effects on soil properties were greater during the season with higher rainfall, with no effects of cultivar and rotation on this infertile sandy soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting increased sorghum height by 44.4% relative to late planting in season 2.
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“early planted sorghum outperformed the late planted crop, with 44.4 % greater height”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting increased sorghum 1000-seed weight by 36.1% relative to late planting in season 2.
- Treatment
- early plantede0
- Outcome
- 1000-seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 36.1 %e0
- Comparator
- late planted crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“early planted sorghum outperformed the late planted crop, with 44.4 % greater height and 36.1 % higher 1000-seed weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting produced higher sorghum grain yield than late planting in season 2.
- Treatment
- earlye0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.33 and 0.56 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- season 2e0
- Comparator
- late plantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (1.33 and 0.56 t/ha, respectively) and dry matter yield (2.38 and 1.10 t/ha, respectively) were significantly higher for early than late planting in season 2”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting produced higher sorghum dry matter yield than late planting in season 2.
- Treatment
- earlye0
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.38 and 1.10 t/hae0
- Comparator
- late plantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (1.33 and 0.56 t/ha, respectively) and dry matter yield (2.38 and 1.10 t/ha, respectively) were significantly higher for early than late planting in season 2”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till had higher soil organic carbon, available phosphorus and exchangeable potassium than conventional tillage in season 2.
- Treatment
- NT treatmente0
- Outcome
- SOC, available P and exchangeable Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CT treatmente0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The NT treatment had significantly higher SOC, available P and exchangeable K than CT treatment in season 2”
Claim · model-written summary
Early planting had 30.4% higher soil exchangeable potassium than late planting in season 3.
- Treatment
- early plantinge0
- Outcome
- exchangeable Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 30.4 %e0
- Comparator
- late plantinge0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“In season 3, early planting had 30.4 % higher exchangeable K than late planting”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased soil total nitrogen by 50% relative to conventional tillage in season 3.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“NT increased total N and SOC by 50 and 34.8 %, respectively than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
No-till increased soil organic carbon by 34.8% relative to conventional tillage in season 3.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“NT increased total N and SOC by 50 and 34.8 %, respectively than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar and rotation had no reported effects on sorghum productivity on this infertile sandy soil.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“with no effects of cultivar and rotation on this infertile sandy soil”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
tillage · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →sowing time · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.