Paper · 2025 · OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences

Differential Response of Chitosan-Pretreated Rice Cultivars at the Seedling Stage to Drought Stress on Growth and Leaf Metabolites

Wasinee Pongprayoon; Sataporn Deeying; Sakchai Hongthong; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of drought stress presents a significant obstacle to global rice cultivation, particularly in arid regions affected by climate change-induced water scarcity. Despite extensive research on the efficacy of exogenously applied chitosan in enhancing drought tolerance across various crops, there remains a gap in understanding the differential responses of chitosan-treated rice seedlings among different cultivars and different chitosan concentrations during pre-drought and drought stress conditions. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effects of chitosan application on the stress responses of four distinct rice cultivars, namely Khao Dowk Mali 105 (KDML105), Suphanburi 1 (SB1), Riceberry (RB), and RD49 during before and drought stress conditions. The study observed significant variations in phenotypic traits, particularly shoot and root weights, among the cultivars, following chitosan treatment (10, 20, and 40 ppm) during simulated drought stress. The results indicate that the application of 10 ppm of chitosan considerably improves the growth of shoots in the KDML105 under conditions of drought stress. This improvement is associated with an increase in the levels of fructose and glucose in the leaves. Chitosan treatment in SB1 showed higher concentrations of amino acids, including proline, that facilitate the development of roots in drought conditions. Conversely, RB and RD49 demonstrated adverse effects on growth parameters, with elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress. This study highlights the diverse reactions of several rice cultivars to chitosan pretreatment when subjected to drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment produced significant variation in seedling shoot and root weights among rice cultivars during simulated drought.

Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
shoot and root weightse0
Direction
significant variationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The study observed significant variations in phenotypic traits, particularly shoot and root weights, among the cultivars, following chitosan treatment (10, 20, and 40 ppm) during simulated drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 ppm, chitosan improved shoot growth of KDML105 under drought.

Material
KDML105e0
Treatment
10 ppm of chitosane0
Outcome
growth of shootse0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results indicate that the application of 10 ppm of chitosan considerably improves the growth of shoots in the KDML105 under conditions of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The KDML105 shoot improvement was associated with increased leaf fructose and glucose.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
levels of fructose and glucosee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“This improvement is associated with an increase in the levels of fructose and glucose in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment in SB1 raised amino acid concentrations, including proline.

Material
SB1e0
Outcome
concentrations of amino acids, including prolinee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chitosan treatment in SB1 showed higher concentrations of amino acids, including proline, that facilitate the development of roots in drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treated SB1 showed facilitated root development under drought.

Material
SB1e0
Outcome
development of rootse0
Direction
facilitatee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chitosan treatment in SB1 showed higher concentrations of amino acids, including proline, that facilitate the development of roots in drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB had adverse growth responses under chitosan pretreatment and drought.

Material
RBe0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conversely, RB and RD49 demonstrated adverse effects on growth parameters, with elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RD49 had adverse growth responses under chitosan pretreatment and drought.

Material
RD49e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conversely, RB and RD49 demonstrated adverse effects on growth parameters, with elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB showed elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.

Material
RBe0
Outcome
H2O2 levelse0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conversely, RB and RD49 demonstrated adverse effects on growth parameters, with elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RD49 showed elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.

Material
RD49e0
Outcome
H2O2 levelse0
Direction
elevatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conversely, RB and RD49 demonstrated adverse effects on growth parameters, with elevated H2O2 levels indicating oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1545 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.