Paper · 2024 · Drying Technology

Effects of ultrasonic-assisted osmotic pretreatment on convective air-drying assisted radio frequency drying of apple slices

Wei Jin; Min Zhang; Qing Sun; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Convective air-drying assisted radio frequency drying (CARFD) is an innovative method with the merits of rapid volumetric heating, energy efficiency, as well as high quality food products. However, knowledge about how pretreatment methods impact on the physicochemical characteristics of pretreated apples and the performance of subsequent CARFD is limited. In present work, apple slices were subjected to osmotic pretreatment (OP) and ultrasonic-assisted osmotic pretreatment (USOP) with different intensities (1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 W/g); and the physicochemical properties of pretreated samples (such as mass transfer behavior, water migration status, dielectric loss factor and the others) were compared. The drying duration, energy consumption and a series of quality characteristics (color index, texture, nutrient compositions, antioxidant activity, and so on) of the CARFD produced apple slices were also investigated. The microstructure observations revealed that acoustic waves induced the structural changes and created microchannels. Meanwhile, physicochemical properties of pretreated samples also demonstrated that OP and USOP methods significantly facilitated the water migration status and heightened the dielectric loss factor. In comparison with control and OP methods, three USOP methods were successful in reducing the drying time (14.6%∼27.1%) and total energy consumption (4.5 ∼ 19.8%) of entire processing steps. Concomitantly, USOP (2.0 W/g) samples after drying showed an enhanced quality characteristics in terms of good texture, higher retention of bioactive compounds, higher rehydration ratio, better antioxidant capacity. This study highlights the application of USOP as an effective pretreatment method for enhancing the process efficiency and quality of CARFD produced apple slices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultrasonic waves altered apple slice microstructure and created microchannels.

Treatment
acoustic wavese0
Outcome
structural changes and created microchannelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acoustic waves induced the structural changes and created microchannels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic pretreatment facilitated water migration in apple slices.

Treatment
OPe0
Outcome
water migration statuse0
Direction
facilitatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OP and USOP methods significantly facilitated the water migration status and heightened the dielectric loss factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ultrasonic-assisted osmotic pretreatment facilitated water migration in apple slices.

Treatment
USOPe0
Outcome
water migration statuse0
Direction
facilitatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OP and USOP methods significantly facilitated the water migration status and heightened the dielectric loss factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

OP increased the dielectric loss factor of apple slices.

Treatment
OPe0
Outcome
dielectric loss factore0
Direction
heightenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OP and USOP methods significantly facilitated the water migration status and heightened the dielectric loss factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

USOP increased the dielectric loss factor of apple slices.

Treatment
USOPe0
Outcome
dielectric loss factore0
Direction
heightenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OP and USOP methods significantly facilitated the water migration status and heightened the dielectric loss factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three USOP treatments reduced drying time by 14.6%∼27.1% compared with control and OP.

Treatment
three USOP methodse0
Outcome
drying timee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
14.6%∼27.1%e0
Comparator
control and OP methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with control and OP methods, three USOP methods were successful in reducing the drying time (14.6%∼27.1%) and total energy consumption (4.5 ∼ 19.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three USOP treatments reduced total energy consumption by 4.5 ∼ 19.8% compared with control and OP.

Treatment
three USOP methodse0
Outcome
total energy consumptione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
4.5 ∼ 19.8%e0
Comparator
control and OP methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison with control and OP methods, three USOP methods were successful in reducing the drying time (14.6%∼27.1%) and total energy consumption (4.5 ∼ 19.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried apple slices pretreated with USOP at 2.0 W/g had good texture and improved bioactive compound retention and rehydration ratio.

Treatment
USOP (2.0 W/g)e0
Outcome
good texture, higher retention of bioactive compounds, higher rehydration ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USOP (2.0 W/g) samples after drying showed an enhanced quality characteristics in terms of good texture, higher retention of bioactive compounds, higher rehydration ratio, better antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried apple slices pretreated with USOP at 2.0 W/g showed better antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
USOP (2.0 W/g)e0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USOP (2.0 W/g) samples after drying showed an enhanced quality characteristics in terms of good texture, higher retention of bioactive compounds, higher rehydration ratio, better antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

physical treatment · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

physical treatment · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.