Paper · 2024 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

No yield advantage of biodynamic compost preparations in a long-term field trial

Lars Dietrich; Christian Dahn; Jürgen Fritz; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Biodynamic farming is a growing branch of organic farming which uses various so-called biodynamic preparations with the aim to enhance plant growth and soil quality. These preparations comprise plant parts fermented in animal sheaths (e.g., cow intestines or deer bladders) which are then applied to manures and composts before applying to the field (compost preparations). Two special preparations based on manure and silica are applied to the crops as field sprays (spray preparations). The effect of these biodynamic preparations, however, is a matter of debate. In a long-term experiment over 27 yrs, within an organic crop rotation, the use of biodynamic compost preparations has recently been shown to impact the soil biological community. Using the same experiment, we investigated whether these soil-level effects also displayed in agronomic parameters of arable crops. We found that the use of biodynamic compost preparations, when compared with farmyard manure (FYM) compost application without preparations, had no effect on yield in any of the investigated crops (spring wheat, winter wheat, oats, winter rye, faba bean, potatoes, maize, and grass/clover), or when data from all crops were pooled. Temporal yield stability of spring wheat and grass/clover was also unaffected by the biodynamic compost preparations. The application of FYM compost, however, led to significant increases in both yield and yield stability as compared to the non-fertilized control. We conclude that while biodynamic compost preparations did influence biological processes in the soil, they did not increase the crop yields in our long-term trial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodynamic compost preparations did not affect yields of the eight investigated crops relative to compost without preparations.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
biodynamic compost preparationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
had no effecte0
Qualifier
spring wheat, winter wheat, oats, winter rye, faba bean, potatoes, maize, and grass/clovere0
Comparator
farmyard manure (FYM) compost application without preparationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biodynamic compost preparations, when compared with farmyard manure (FYM) compost application without preparations, had no effect on yield in any of the investigated crops (spring wheat, winter wheat, oats, winter rye, faba bean, potatoes, maize, and grass/clover)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodynamic compost preparations did not affect pooled yield across crops.

Taxon
arable cropse2
Treatment
biodynamic compost preparationse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
had no effecte1
Qualifier
data from all crops were poolede0
Comparator
farmyard manure (FYM) compost application without preparationse1

Verbatim

e0

“or when data from all crops were pooled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of biodynamic compost preparations, when compared with farmyard manure (FYM) compost application without preparations, had no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1050 · show in text ↑
e2

“agronomic parameters of arable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodynamic compost preparations did not affect temporal yield stability of spring wheat.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
biodynamic compost preparationse0
Outcome
Temporal yield stabilitye0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temporal yield stability of spring wheat and grass/clover was also unaffected by the biodynamic compost preparations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodynamic compost preparations did not affect temporal yield stability of grass/clover.

Taxon
grass/clovere0
Treatment
biodynamic compost preparationse0
Outcome
Temporal yield stabilitye0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Temporal yield stability of spring wheat and grass/clover was also unaffected by the biodynamic compost preparations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure compost significantly increased crop yield relative to the unfertilized control.

Taxon
arable cropse1
Treatment
FYM composte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
non-fertilized controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of FYM compost, however, led to significant increases in both yield and yield stability as compared to the non-fertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic parameters of arable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure compost significantly increased crop yield stability relative to the unfertilized control.

Taxon
arable cropse1
Treatment
FYM composte0
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
non-fertilized controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of FYM compost, however, led to significant increases in both yield and yield stability as compared to the non-fertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic parameters of arable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–885 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Composts yielded similarly to mineral fertilizer with lower weed pressure.

    Biodynamic preparations: Short-term effects on crops, soils, and weed populations · 2000 · compared with equal nutrients supplied by mineral fertilizer

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.