Abstract
A field experiment carried out during the Zaid 2024 at the Research Farm, School of Agriculture, OM Sterling Global University, Hisar (Haryana) India, to study the effects of different organic nutrient regimes combined with biofertilizer applications on nodule formation, yield, and nutritional quality of mung bean crops. Seven treatments involving organic manures and biofertilizers were tested in a randomized block design with three replications. The results showed a significantly higher number of root nodules per plant (11.33, 22.33, 19.72, and 13.44) and dry weight of nodules per plant (11.47, 22.86, 19.79, and 13.30 mg) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest, respectively. Yield results included seed yield (1,197 kg/ha), stover yield (2,342 kg/ha), biological yield (3,539 kg/ha), and harvest index (33.84%). Quality measures such as protein content (20.08%) and protein yield (240.32 kg/ha) were highest in the treatment with Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha applied in three splits (at sowing, 30 DAS, and 45 DAS) combined with Rhizobium and PSB (T7), while the lowest results for these parameters were observed in the control treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Root nodule number per mung bean plant was significantly higher under the treatments at 30, 45, 60 DAS and harvest.
- Taxon
- Mung Bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Organ / stage
- 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harveste1
- Outcome
- number of root nodules per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 11.33, 22.33, 19.72, and 13.44e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“The results showed a significantly higher number of root nodules per plant (11.33, 22.33, 19.72, and 13.44) and dry weight of nodules per plant (11.47, 22.86, 19.79, and 13.30 mg) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nodule dry weight per mung bean plant was significantly higher under the treatments at 30, 45, 60 DAS and harvest.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Organ / stage
- 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harveste1
- Outcome
- dry weight of nodules per plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 11.47, 22.86, 19.79, and 13.30 mge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e1“The results showed a significantly higher number of root nodules per plant (11.33, 22.33, 19.72, and 13.44) and dry weight of nodules per plant (11.47, 22.86, 19.79, and 13.30 mg) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean seed yield was 1,197 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- seed yielde2
- Value
- 1,197 kg/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“Yield results included seed yield (1,197 kg/ha), stover yield (2,342 kg/ha), biological yield (3,539 kg/ha), and harvest index (33.84%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean stover yield was 2,342 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- stover yielde2
- Value
- 2,342 kg/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“Yield results included seed yield (1,197 kg/ha), stover yield (2,342 kg/ha), biological yield (3,539 kg/ha), and harvest index (33.84%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean biological yield was 3,539 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- biological yielde2
- Value
- 3,539 kg/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“Yield results included seed yield (1,197 kg/ha), stover yield (2,342 kg/ha), biological yield (3,539 kg/ha), and harvest index (33.84%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean harvest index was 33.84%.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe2
- Value
- 33.84%e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“Yield results included seed yield (1,197 kg/ha), stover yield (2,342 kg/ha), biological yield (3,539 kg/ha), and harvest index (33.84%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha with Rhizobium and PSB gave the highest mung bean protein content (20.08%), against the lowest in the control.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha applied in three splits (at sowing, 30 DAS, and 45 DAS) combined with Rhizobium and PSB (T7)e3
- Second interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Outcome
- protein contente3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 20.08%e3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e3“Quality measures such as protein content (20.08%) and protein yield (240.32 kg/ha) were highest in the treatment with Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha applied in three splits (at sowing, 30 DAS, and 45 DAS) combined with Rhizobium and PSB (T7), while the lowest results for these parameters were observed in the control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha with Rhizobium and PSB gave the highest mung bean protein yield (240.32 kg/ha), against the lowest in the control.
- Taxon
- Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha applied in three splits (at sowing, 30 DAS, and 45 DAS) combined with Rhizobium and PSB (T7)e3
- Second interactor
- PSBe3symbiont
- Outcome
- protein yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 240.32 kg/hae3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)”
e3“Quality measures such as protein content (20.08%) and protein yield (240.32 kg/ha) were highest in the treatment with Jeevamrutha at 3000 l/ha applied in three splits (at sowing, 30 DAS, and 45 DAS) combined with Rhizobium and PSB (T7), while the lowest results for these parameters were observed in the control treatment”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.