Paper · 2024 · Agronomy Journal

Ametoctradin + dimethomorph spray frequency affects late blight disease and yield in potato genotypes

Mariette Anoumaa; Christopher Suh; Eric Bertrand Kouam; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) production is hindered by several diseases, the worst being the late blight disease caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary. This study aimed at determining an appropriate frequency of ametoctradin + dimethomorph ([26.9 + 20.2]%) spray for late blight disease management in potato genotypes. Field experiments were conducted in Bansoa, Cameroon, from August to October in 2019 and 2020 growing seasons The experimental design was a split‐plot design with three replications. Three ametoctradin + dimethomorph spray frequencies (4‐, 7‐, and 10‐day intervals) were tested at the plot level, whereas seven genotypes including Banso, CIPIRA, Desiree, Dosa, Jacob2005, Manate, and Tezelfo were tested at the subplot level. The commonly used fungicide combination, which includes Mancozeb 80% wettable powder supplemented with cymoxanil + chlorotalomil [(30 + 6)%] wettable powder, was sprayed at 3‐day intervals (a total of 18 sprays) and was used as a positive control. Negative control plots were not sprayed. Data were collected on late blight rAUDPC (relative area under the disease progress curve) and yield components. Results showed all fungicide spray frequencies reduced rAUDPC and consequently increased potato yield. The most economically efficient spray frequency was the 7‐day interval with a total of nine sprays, which resulted in an increased net return of $9738 ha −1 with 9.6% profitability against the commonly used fungicide mix. The total number of fungicide sprays could be reduced to six for genotypes Banso and CIPIRA, which showed lower rAUDPC. The mean yield loss associated with unsprayed plots was 93.2%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each fungicide spray frequency reduced late blight rAUDPC.

Treatment
fungicide spray frequenciese0
Outcome
rAUDPCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fungicide spray frequencies reduced rAUDPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each spray frequency increased potato yield.

Treatment
fungicide spray frequenciese0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all fungicide spray frequencies reduced rAUDPC and consequently increased potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day spraying produced an increased net return of $9738 ha −1 versus the common fungicide mix.

Treatment
7‐day intervale0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
$9738 ha −1e0
Comparator
commonly used fungicide mixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most economically efficient spray frequency was the 7‐day interval with a total of nine sprays, which resulted in an increased net return of $9738 ha −1 with 9.6% profitability against the commonly used fungicide mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day spraying had 9.6% profitability versus the common mix.

Treatment
7‐day intervale0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.6%e0
Comparator
commonly used fungicide mixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most economically efficient spray frequency was the 7‐day interval with a total of nine sprays, which resulted in an increased net return of $9738 ha −1 with 9.6% profitability against the commonly used fungicide mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays could be reduced to six for Banso and CIPIRA, which had lower rAUDPC.

Material
Banso and CIPIRAe0
Outcome
total number of fungicide sprays could be reduced to sixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total number of fungicide sprays could be reduced to six for genotypes Banso and CIPIRA, which showed lower rAUDPC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unsprayed plots had mean yield loss of 93.2%.

Treatment
unsprayed plotse0
Outcome
mean yield losse0
Value
93.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean yield loss associated with unsprayed plots was 93.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.