Abstract
The experiment was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Sam Higgin bottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during Rabi season in 2023-24. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments viz., Neem oil 2% @ 2ml/lit, Beauveria bassiana 1×1010 conidia/ml @ 2gm/lit, Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% @ 3ml/lit, Bacillus thuringiensis @ 2gm/lit, Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5ml/lit, Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.5ml/lit, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 1gm/lit and untreated control, with three replications. The data recorded on larval population of pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) on third, seventh and fourteen days after two sprays revealed that Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was superior among all treatments with larval population of 2.12 and with highest cost benefit ratio and marketable yield of 1:3.65 and 29.16q/ha, followed by Spinosad 45 SC with a larval population of 2.42 and cost benefit ratio and yield 1:3.14 and 26.66 q/ha, Indoxacarb 14.5 SC with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.57, 1:3.12 and 25.83 q/ha, Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC with a larval population,cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.79, 1:2.81 and 22.5 q/ha, Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml with larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.04, 1:2.79 and 21.25 q/ha, Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.25, 1:2.26, 17.08 q/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SG recorded larval population of 2.12.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat1pest - Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 2.12e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was superior among all treatments with larval population of 2.12 and with highest cost benefit ratio and marketable yield of 1:3.65 and 29.16q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SG recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:3.65.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:3.65e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was superior among all treatments with larval population of 2.12 and with highest cost benefit ratio and marketable yield of 1:3.65 and 29.16q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SG recorded yield of 29.16q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 29.16q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was superior among all treatments with larval population of 2.12 and with highest cost benefit ratio and marketable yield of 1:3.65 and 29.16q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC recorded larval population of 2.42.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 2.42e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45 SC with a larval population of 2.42 and cost benefit ratio and yield 1:3.14 and 26.66 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:3.14.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:3.14e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45 SC with a larval population of 2.42 and cost benefit ratio and yield 1:3.14 and 26.66 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC recorded yield of 26.66 q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 26.66 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad 45 SC with a larval population of 2.42 and cost benefit ratio and yield 1:3.14 and 26.66 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb 14.5 SC recorded larval population of 2.57.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 2.57e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.57, 1:3.12 and 25.83 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb 14.5 SC recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:3.12.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:3.12e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.57, 1:3.12 and 25.83 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb 14.5 SC recorded yield of 25.83 q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 25.83 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indoxacarb 14.5 SC with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.57, 1:3.12 and 25.83 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC recorded larval population of 2.79.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% ECe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 2.79e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC with a larval population,cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.79, 1:2.81 and 22.5 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:2.81.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% ECe0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:2.81e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC with a larval population,cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.79, 1:2.81 and 22.5 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC recorded yield of 22.5 q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% ECe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 22.5 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Profenofos 40% + Cypermethrin 4% EC with a larval population,cost benefit ratio and yield of 2.79, 1:2.81 and 22.5 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml recorded larval population of 3.04.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/mle0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 3.04e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml with larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.04, 1:2.79 and 21.25 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:2.79.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/mle0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:2.79e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml with larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.04, 1:2.79 and 21.25 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml recorded yield of 21.25 q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/mle0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 21.25 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacillus thuringiensis @ 5mg/ml with larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.04, 1:2.79 and 21.25 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml recorded larval population of 3.25.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/mle0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Value
- 3.25e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.25, 1:2.26, 17.08 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
t1“Helicoverpa armigera”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml recorded cost benefit ratio of 1:2.26.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/mle0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Value
- 1:2.26e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.25, 1:2.26, 17.08 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml recorded yield of 17.08 q/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/mle0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 17.08 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Beauveria bassiana @ 1×1010 conidia/ml with a larval population, cost benefit ratio and yield of 3.25, 1:2.26, 17.08 q/ha”
t0“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
cypermethrin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Beauveria bassiana · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Beauveria bassiana · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →cypermethrin · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →indoxacarb · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →profenofos · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Bacillus thuringiensis · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.