Paper · 2024 · PhytoFrontiers™

Field Evaluation of Manure-Based Amendments and Biological Control Agents’ Influence on Root Lesion Nematodes in Potato

Luisa M. Parrado; Emilie Cole; Marisol Quintanilla

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Potato yields are significantly impacted by soilborne diseases such as the root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans. Traditional management strategies involve soil fumigation with broad-spectrum pesticides, such as metam sodium, and postplanting applications of nonfumigant nematicides, including oxamyl and fluopyram. In Michigan, approximately 35% of potato hectares are treated with metam sodium, and 50 to 60% of potato hectares are amended with customized manure-based composts. Considering the critical impact of this nematode on the potato industry, along with potential future restrictions on chemical use due to environmental concerns and the growing adoption of organic soil amendments by Michigan potato growers, it is essential to validate manure-based amendments as an alternative management strategy for P. penetrans. To explore this, two field trials were conducted in 2020 and 2021 to assess the impact of manure-based amendments, biological control agents, oxamyl, and their combinations on P. penetrans. This study found that applying raw poultry manure at a rate of 3.08 tons ha −1 , either alone or combined with a single application of oxamyl at 2.5 liters ha −1 , effectively maintained low P. penetrans populations in both soil and roots. Additionally, Compost A and poultry manure increased potato yields. Moreover, the combined application of manure-based amendments and Purpureocillium lilacinum (MeloCon) showed varying efficacy depending on the amendment used. Our studies provide the necessary evidence that validates the efficacy of these management practices to reduce P. penetrans populations and to enhance potato yields. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure maintained low nematode populations in soil and roots.

Treatment
raw poultry manure at a rate of 3.08 tons ha −1e0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pathogen
Outcome
P. penetrans populations in both soil and rootse0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying raw poultry manure at a rate of 3.08 tons ha −1 , either alone or combined with a single application of oxamyl at 2.5 liters ha −1 , effectively maintained low P. penetrans populations in both soil and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure with oxamyl maintained low nematode populations.

Treatment
raw poultry manure at a rate of 3.08 tons ha −1 , either alone or combined with a single application of oxamyl at 2.5 liters ha −1e0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse0pathogen
Outcome
P. penetrans populations in both soil and rootse0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying raw poultry manure at a rate of 3.08 tons ha −1 , either alone or combined with a single application of oxamyl at 2.5 liters ha −1 , effectively maintained low P. penetrans populations in both soil and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost A increased potato yield.

Treatment
Compost Ae0
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost A and poultry manure increased potato yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure increased potato yield.

Treatment
poultry manuree0
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost A and poultry manure increased potato yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficacy of manure amendments with Purpureocillium lilacinum varied by amendment.

Treatment
combined application of manure-based amendments and Purpureocillium lilacinum (MeloCon)e0
Interactor
P. penetransPratylenchus penetranse1pathogen
Second interactor
Purpureocillium lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
varying efficacye0
Qualifier
depending on the amendment usede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus penetrans
Pratylenchus penetrans · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of manure-based amendments and Purpureocillium lilacinum (MeloCon) showed varying efficacy depending on the amendment used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“impact of manure-based amendments, biological control agents, oxamyl, and their combinations on P. penetrans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1024 · show in text ↑

oxamyl · Pratylenchus penetrans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · Pratylenchus penetrans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.