Paper · 2024 · Plants

When Light Is Crucial, but Wind Is Rather Trivial: A Basil Case Study

Efterpi Florou; Angela Politi; Evangelia Andreadaki; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Light intensity and wind are critical environmental factors of abiotic stress on plants, triggering a considerable number of morphological and physiological responses. This study tested the hypothesis that different light and wind conditions (full sunlight ± wind, shade ± wind) would affect the leaf content of photosynthetic pigments and anthocyanins, as well as the plant height, the fresh and dry weight of the aboveground part, and Water-Use Efficiency on Ocimum basilicum plants. About 16 days after the application of the different conditions, all leaf pigments of the shaded plants exhibited increased contents compared to the lightened ones. Subsequently, this response was enhanced until the 39th day, which was the final day of the experiment. Furthermore, shaded plants grew taller, although their fresh and dry weight and Water-Use Efficiency were lower than that of the corresponding lightened ones. On the other hand, wind did not have any effect on pigment content. Concerning the plant growth indexes, reduced values were observed on the wind-treated plants. The above results demonstrate a considerable effect of light intensity while the applied wind seems to be mild enough to induce important plant responses, partially confirming the hypothesis studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased all basil leaf pigment contents compared with full light after about 16 days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume1
Treatment
shaded plantse0
Outcome
all leaf pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
About 16 dayse0
Comparator
lightened onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 16 days after the application of the different conditions, all leaf pigments of the shaded plants exhibited increased contents compared to the lightened ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shade effect on pigments strengthened through day 39.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume2
Outcome
all leaf pigmentse1
Direction
enhancede0
Value
39th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsequently, this response was enhanced until the 39th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“all leaf pigments of the shaded plants exhibited increased contents compared to the lightened ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–649 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded basil plants grew taller than light exposed plants.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume1
Treatment
shaded plantse0
Outcome
grew tallere0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shaded plants grew taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded basil had lower fresh and dry aboveground weight than light exposed plants.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume1
Treatment
shaded plantse0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
corresponding lightened onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shaded plants grew taller, although their fresh and dry weight and Water-Use Efficiency were lower than that of the corresponding lightened ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaded basil had lower water use efficiency than light exposed plants.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume1
Treatment
shaded plantse0
Outcome
Water-Use Efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
corresponding lightened onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shaded plants grew taller, although their fresh and dry weight and Water-Use Efficiency were lower than that of the corresponding lightened ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind did not significantly change basil pigment content.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume1
Treatment
winde0
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
did not have any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wind did not have any effect on pigment content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind treatment reduced basil growth indexes.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicumOcimum basilicume2
Treatment
wind-treatede0
Outcome
plant growth indexese1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced values were observed on the wind-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the plant growth indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ocimum basilicum plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–484 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.