Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

RESPONSE OF SPRING BARLEY VARIETIES ON DIFFERENT CULTIVATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE ROSTOV REGION

L. P. Beltyukov; E. K. Kuvshinova; R. G. Bershansky; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil). The technologies varied in doses of mineral nutrition and protection during vegetation.The technological effect was studied according to three methods of primary tillage, i.e. plowing, combined tillage and surface tillage. The study showed that these factors influenced a lot on productivity, grain quality and economic profitability. The varieties showed the greatest productivity and better grain quality when cultivated by intensive technologies using plowing as a primary tillage. The article gives the assessment of economic profitability of spring barley. The improvement of the variety productivity and an increase of intensive cultivation showed economic efficiency reduce. The receiving of the yield per unit area using intensive technologies with a plowing turned to be the most expensive one with a total expenditure of 13287-13386 rub/ha, a prime cost of 3264-3524 rub/ha and a net income of 6173-7114 rub/ha. The cultivation of barley using extensive technologies with a surface tillage turned to be low-cost (6563-6574 rub/ha). The prime cost was the lowest one (2206-2369 rub/ha) and the net income was the highest one (7287-8326 rub/ha). Among all cultivation technologies an extensive method showed the maximum profitability of 95,1-126,7 %,when an intensive method showed only 43,0-53,1%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation with plowing as primary tillage gave the greatest spring barley productivity.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
intensive technologies using plowing as a primary tillagee2
Outcome
productivitye2
Direction
greateste2
Setting
southern part of the Rostov regione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“The varieties showed the greatest productivity and better grain quality when cultivated by intensive technologies using plowing as a primary tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive cultivation with plowing as primary tillage gave better spring barley grain quality.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
intensive technologies using plowing as a primary tillagee2
Outcome
grain qualitye2
Direction
bettere2
Setting
southern part of the Rostov regione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“The varieties showed the greatest productivity and better grain quality when cultivated by intensive technologies using plowing as a primary tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive technologies with plowing had the highest total expenditure, 13287-13386 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
intensive technologies with a plowinge3
Outcome
total expendituree3
Direction
most expensivee3
Value
13287-13386 rub/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e3

“The receiving of the yield per unit area using intensive technologies with a plowing turned to be the most expensive one with a total expenditure of 13287-13386 rub/ha, a prime cost of 3264-3524 rub/ha and a net income of 6173-7114 rub/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive technologies with plowing had a prime cost of 3264-3524 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
intensive technologies with a plowinge3
Outcome
prime coste3
Value
3264-3524 rub/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e3

“The receiving of the yield per unit area using intensive technologies with a plowing turned to be the most expensive one with a total expenditure of 13287-13386 rub/ha, a prime cost of 3264-3524 rub/ha and a net income of 6173-7114 rub/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive technologies with plowing gave a net income of 6173-7114 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
intensive technologies with a plowinge3
Outcome
net incomee3
Value
6173-7114 rub/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e3

“The receiving of the yield per unit area using intensive technologies with a plowing turned to be the most expensive one with a total expenditure of 13287-13386 rub/ha, a prime cost of 3264-3524 rub/ha and a net income of 6173-7114 rub/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive surface-tillage technology was low-cost, 6563-6574 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
extensive technologies with a surface tillagee5
Outcome
coste5
Value
6563-6574 rub/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cultivation of barley using extensive technologies with a surface tillage turned to be low-cost (6563-6574 rub/ha). The prime cost was the lowest one (2206-2369 rub/ha) and the net income was the highest one (7287-8326 rub/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive surface-tillage technology had the lowest prime cost, 2206-2369 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
extensive technologies with a surface tillagee5
Outcome
prime coste5
Direction
loweste5
Value
2206-2369 rub/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cultivation of barley using extensive technologies with a surface tillage turned to be low-cost (6563-6574 rub/ha). The prime cost was the lowest one (2206-2369 rub/ha) and the net income was the highest one (7287-8326 rub/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive surface-tillage technology had the highest net income, 7287-8326 rub/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
extensive technologies with a surface tillagee5
Outcome
net incomee5
Direction
higheste5
Value
7287-8326 rub/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cultivation of barley using extensive technologies with a surface tillage turned to be low-cost (6563-6574 rub/ha). The prime cost was the lowest one (2206-2369 rub/ha) and the net income was the highest one (7287-8326 rub/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extensive method showed the maximum profitability, 95,1-126,7 %, compared with the intensive method.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
an extensive methode6
Outcome
profitabilitye6
Direction
maximume6
Value
95,1-126,7 %e6
Comparator
an intensive methode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among all cultivation technologies an extensive method showed the maximum profitability of 95,1-126,7 %,when an intensive method showed only 43,0-53,1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intensive method showed only 43,0-53,1% profitability.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
an intensive methode6
Outcome
profitabilitye6
Value
43,0-53,1%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among all cultivation technologies an extensive method showed the maximum profitability of 95,1-126,7 %,when an intensive method showed only 43,0-53,1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher variety productivity and more intensive cultivation reduced economic efficiency.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
an increase of intensive cultivatione7
Outcome
economic efficiencye7
Direction
reducee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the southern part of the Rostov region we studied effect of different cultivation technologies on productivity of spring barley varieties ‘Vikont’ (for forage) and ‘Priazovsky 9’ (for brewing) in heavy loamy carbonate chernozem (black soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e7

“The improvement of the variety productivity and an increase of intensive cultivation showed economic efficiency reduce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–925 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.