Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Effects of Water–Nitrogen Interaction on Sandy Soil, Physiology, and Morphology of Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) Turf

Wenfei Guo; Wenchao Zhang; Liebao Han

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The soil water and nitrogen (N) levels are the important factors affecting turfgrass growth. However, the impact of the water–N interaction on tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) in terms of the N metabolism and plant morphology remains uncertain. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of different N and water levels on the physiological and morphological responses of tall fescue. The experiment was designed with N (N0, N2, and N4 representing N application rates of 0, 2, and 4 g m–2, respectively) and irrigation [W1, W2, W3, W4, and W5 representing field water capacities (FWCs) of 90~100%, 75~85%, 60~70%, 45~55%, and 30~40%, respectively] treatments, and the relevant indexes of the soil water content and soil NH4+–N and NO3−–N levels as well as the physiology and morphology of the tall fescue were determined. The results demonstrated significant changes in the contents of soil water (SWC) and N and the physiological and morphological indexes, except for the enzymes related to N metabolism, including nitrite reductase (NiR), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and glutamate synthetase (GOGAT). The water stress significantly enhanced the water and N use efficiencies (WUE and NUE), except the NUE in the W5 treatment. The N stress significantly influenced the SWC, soil NO3−–N content, and physiological and morphological indexes, excluding malondialdehyde, NiR, GOGAT, and above- (AGB) and below-ground biomass, resulting in the increased WUE and NUE. The application of a low N rate effectively alleviated the detrimental impacts of water stress on the SWC and glutamine synthetase activity. In conclusion, W2 and N2 are deemed more appropriate treatments for the low-maintenance measures of tall fescue turf. Among all the treatments, N2W2 is recommended as the optimal water–N interaction treatment due to its ability to conserve resources while still ensuring high turf quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and N treatments changed soil water and nitrogen contents and plant indexes, except N metabolism enzymes.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
physiological and morphological indexese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant changes in the contents of soil water (SWC) and N and the physiological and morphological indexes, except for the enzymes related to N metabolism, including nitrite reductase (NiR), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and glutamate synthetase (GOGAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased water use efficiency.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
water and N use efficiencies (WUE and NUE)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water stress significantly enhanced the water and N use efficiencies (WUE and NUE), except the NUE in the W5 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased nitrogen use efficiency except under W5.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
N use efficiencies (WUE and NUE)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
except the NUE in the W5 treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water stress significantly enhanced the water and N use efficiencies (WUE and NUE), except the NUE in the W5 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N stress changed soil water, nitrate and plant indexes, with stated exceptions.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
physiological and morphological indexese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N stress significantly influenced the SWC, soil NO3−–N content, and physiological and morphological indexes, excluding malondialdehyde, NiR, GOGAT, and above- (AGB) and below-ground biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1459 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N stress increased water and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume2
Treatment
N stresse1
Outcome
WUE and NUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in the increased WUE and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1499 · show in text ↑
e1

“The N stress significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1303 · show in text ↑
e2

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N rate alleviated water stress effects on soil water and glutamine synthetase.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
a low N ratee0
Outcome
SWC and glutamine synthetase activitye0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of a low N rate effectively alleviated the detrimental impacts of water stress on the SWC and glutamine synthetase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

W2 and N2 were deemed appropriate low-maintenance treatments.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
more appropriate treatments for the low-maintenance measurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2 and N2 are deemed more appropriate treatments for the low-maintenance measures of tall fescue turf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1759 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N2W2 was recommended as optimal for resource conservation and high turf quality.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
optimal water–N interaction treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2W2 is recommended as the optimal water–N interaction treatment due to its ability to conserve resources while still ensuring high turf quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1931 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–183 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.