Paper · 2024 · Botanica Pacifica

Root microbiomes of Zygophyllaceae in the Kazakhstan desert: a weak evidence for rhizobial nitrogen fixation

Vladimir G. Onipchenko; Alexandra A. Klyukina; Ilya V. Kublanov; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The plants of the Zygophyllaceae family are often considered to be capable of symbiotic atmosphere nitrogen fixation, forming rhizobial nodules similar to those of Fabaceae and Urticaceae. In four species of Zygophyllaceae and the related Peganum harmala (hereafter called Z-plants), collected in Dzungarian deserts (Kazakhstan), we analyzed the prokaryotic component of the root microbiome and the 15N and 13C content in the leaves of these Z-plants compared with neighboring dicots belonging to other families (R-plants). Among all studied Zygophyllum fabago root samples only one was found to have the root nodule, however the microbiome of this sample was similar to that found in other Z. fabago root samples where nodulation was not observed. If compared to Z-plants, the R-plants had a significantly higher relative abundance of bacteria of genera Glycomyces, Massilia and Streptomyces, while the Z-plants had a higher relative abundance of the representatives of genera Actinomadura, Nocardia and Pseudonocardia. Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples. On average, the Z- and the R-plants did not differ in their δ13С and δ15N. Overall, the results do not allow us to consider the studied Zygophyllaceae plants as species with effective atmospheric nitrogen fixation due to rhizobial symbiosis – a characteristic feature of the most legumes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One Zygophyllum fabago root sample had a nodule.

Taxon
Zygophyllum fabagoZygophyllum fabagoe0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
root nodulee0
Value
only onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zygophyllum fabago
Zygophyllum fabago · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Hurior assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all studied Zygophyllum fabago root samples only one was found to have the root nodule, however the microbiome of this sample was similar to that found in other Z. fabago root samples where nodulation was not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nodulated sample microbiome resembled nonnodulated root samples.

Taxon
Zygophyllum fabagoZygophyllum fabagoe0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
microbiome of this sample was similare0
Comparator
other Z. fabago root samples where nodulation was not observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zygophyllum fabago
Zygophyllum fabago · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Hurior assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all studied Zygophyllum fabago root samples only one was found to have the root nodule, however the microbiome of this sample was similar to that found in other Z. fabago root samples where nodulation was not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R plants had higher relative abundance of Glycomyces, Massilia and Streptomyces.

Taxon
R-plantse0
Interactor
GlycomycesGlycomycese0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of bacteria of genera Glycomyces, Massilia and Streptomycese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Z-plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“If compared to Z-plants, the R-plants had a significantly higher relative abundance of bacteria of genera Glycomyces, Massilia and Streptomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z plants had higher relative abundance of Actinomadura, Nocardia and Pseudonocardia.

Taxon
Z-plantse0
Interactor
ActinomaduraActinomadurae0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of the representatives of genera Actinomadura, Nocardia and Pseudonocardiae0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinomadura
Actinomadura · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Z-plants had a higher relative abundance of the representatives of genera Actinomadura, Nocardia and Pseudonocardia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobiaceae occurred in some R and Z plants.

Taxon
R and Z plantse0
Interactor
RhizobiaceaeRhizobiaceaee0symbiont
Outcome
Rhizobiaceae were presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobiaceae were most abundant in soil samples.

Taxon
ZygophyllaceaeZygophyllaceaet0
Interactor
RhizobiaceaeRhizobiaceaee1symbiont
Outcome
most abundant in soil samplese0

Verbatim

e0

“being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zygophyllaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z and R plants had similar average δ13С.

Taxon
Z-e0
Outcome
δ13Сe0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
R-plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“On average, the Z- and the R-plants did not differ in their δ13С and δ15N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z and R plants had similar average δ15N.

Taxon
Z-e0
Outcome
δ15Ne0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
R-plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“On average, the Z- and the R-plants did not differ in their δ13С and δ15N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied Zygophyllaceae do not show effective atmospheric nitrogen fixation due to rhizobial symbiosis.

Taxon
ZygophyllaceaeZygophyllaceaee0
Outcome
effective atmospheric nitrogen fixation due to rhizobial symbiosise0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the studied Zygophyllaceae plants as species with effective atmospheric nitrogen fixation due to rhizobial symbiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Unidentified representatives of the family Rhizobiaceae were present in some of R and Z plants, being most abundant in soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zygophyllaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–34 · show in text ↑